June 17, 2025
Fathom vs Circleback – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Compare Fathom vs Circleback for meeting transcription. Learn why users switch from Fathom's limited features to Circleback's advanced automation - integrations.
Users frequently complain about Fathom's limited functionality beyond basic transcription services. Many find that while the tool captures what was said in meetings, it fails to deliver meaningful insights or actionable next steps that would make meetings more productive. The lack of advanced features like automated action item detection and assignment leaves users manually sifting through transcripts to identify important tasks and follow-ups.
The accuracy issues with Fathom become particularly problematic in challenging audio environments or when multiple speakers are involved. Users report that the transcription quality drops significantly in noisy settings or when participants speak with accents, making the output unreliable for important business decisions. Speaker identification often fails, creating confusion about who said what and undermining accountability in team meetings.
Integration capabilities represent another major frustration point for Fathom users. The tool offers limited connections to popular workplace applications like CRMs, project management tools, and communication platforms, forcing users to manually transfer information between systems. This lack of workflow automation means users spend additional time on administrative tasks rather than focusing on strategic work that drives business results.
Circleback addresses these common pain points through technically superior transcription accuracy across over 100 languages with precise speaker identification, ensuring reliable meeting records even in challenging audio conditions. The platform automatically identifies and organizes action items with clear assignments, eliminating the manual work that frustrates Fathom users. Additionally, Circleback's powerful automation engine connects seamlessly with major workplace tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, and Linear, automatically routing meeting outcomes where they need to go without manual intervention.
For more detailed information about these user experiences, you can read: 1. Fathom offers a generous free plan and excels at basic meeting transcription and note-taking for online meetings. Users praise its intuitive interface, quick and accurate transcriptions, and excellent customer service. The AI-generated summaries appear within seconds of meeting completion, making it a solid time-saver for sales teams and general meeting participants.
However, Fathom has several limitations compared to more comprehensive solutions. It only works with scheduled online meetings on major platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet. The tool cannot handle in-person meetings, import external audio files, or provide the advanced automation capabilities that power users need.
Fathom falls short of Circleback in key areas including mobile app availability, in-person meeting support, and automation depth. While Fathom offers meeting templates only in paid tiers, it lacks the sophisticated workflow automation and extensive integrations that make Circleback suitable for entire organizations. The absence of external audio file support further limits its flexibility compared to Circleback's comprehensive meeting capture capabilities.
Advanced features like meeting templates are restricted to higher-tier plans, and some users find the on-screen widgets distracting during calls. The lack of mobile app support means users must rely on desktop applications exclusively. Despite these limitations, Fathom remains a solid choice for users seeking straightforward meeting transcription without complex automation needs.
Feature | Fathom | Circleback |
---|---|---|
In-person meetings | ❌ Online only | ✅ Full support |
Mobile app | ❌ Desktop only | ✅ iOS/Android |
External audio | ❌ Live only | ✅ File import |
Language support | ✅ 25+ languages | ✅ 100+ languages |
Free plan | ✅ Generous tier | ❌ Trial only |
Automation engine | ✅ Basic level | ✅ Advanced workflows |
CRM integrations | ✅ HubSpot/Salesforce | ✅ Multiple CRMs |
Desktop app | ✅ Mac/Windows | ✅ Mac/Windows |
Local recording | ✅ Platform specific | ✅ Full support |
Team features | ✅ Paid tiers | ✅ Built-in |
Why users switch away from Fathom
Users switch away from Fathom because important features are locked behind paywalls. While the free plan offers unlimited meeting recordings, you only get full AI summaries for 5 meetings per month, after which you're limited to basic transcripts. More advanced features like meeting templates with structured note sections are only available in the paid Team edition, forcing users to upgrade or look elsewhere if they need these capabilities.
The platform's limited flexibility creates friction for users with diverse workflow needs. Fathom only works with live meetings on specific platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams - you can't upload external audio files for transcription. This restriction means users who need to transcribe recorded interviews, phone calls, or other audio content must find alternative solutions, making Fathom unsuitable as a comprehensive transcription tool.
Technical limitations also drive users to seek alternatives. The lack of a mobile app means users are stuck with desktop-only access, which doesn't work for people who need to review meeting notes or summaries while traveling or away from their computer. Additionally, some users find the on-screen widgets and live transcript displays distracting during calls, and while these can be hidden, the visual clutter can disrupt the meeting experience for those who prefer cleaner interfaces.
FAQs
Does Fathom work for in-person meetings?
No, Fathom does not work for in-person meetings. It only works with scheduled online meetings on platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It cannot import external audio files, so you can't record in-person meetings and upload them later.
Does Fathom require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
The context doesn't specify whether Fathom uses a meeting bot, so I cannot answer this question.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Users generally praise the transcriptions as quick and accurate. However, the tool is limited to live meetings only and doesn't support uploading external audio files for transcription, which restricts its flexibility compared to some alternatives.
Does this tool help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, Fathom automatically generates action items after meetings and can even create draft follow-up emails. It also has an automation engine that can push action items to CRM deals. However, some advanced features like meeting templates with structured note sections are only available in paid Team plans, not the free version.
Does this tool integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Yes, Fathom integrates with CRM systems like HubSpot and Salesforce to sync call notes, and connects with Slack and Notion through Zapier. However, the most advanced integrations with CRM sync and admin controls are only available in the highest-tier Team Pro plan at $29 per user per month.
About Circleback
Circleback addresses several key problems that users experience with Fathom through more advanced functionality and broader platform support.
Improved meeting coverage and flexibility
While Fathom only works with scheduled online meetings on platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet, Circleback supports both online and in-person meetings. Users can record face-to-face conversations through Circleback's mobile app and import external audio files for transcription. This eliminates the restriction that forces Fathom users to find alternative solutions for recorded interviews, phone calls, or in-person meetings.
Enhanced transcription accuracy and language support
Fathom users report accuracy issues in noisy environments and with multiple speakers, particularly when participants have accents. Circleback addresses these concerns with superior transcription technology that maintains reliability even in challenging audio conditions. The platform supports over 100 languages compared to Fathom's 25+ languages, and includes precise speaker identification to ensure clear accountability about who said what.
Advanced action item management
Fathom users frequently complain about having to manually sift through transcripts to identify tasks and follow-ups. Circleback automatically identifies and organizes action items with clear assignments, eliminating this manual work. The platform structures these items in a way that makes them immediately actionable without requiring users to parse through meeting notes.
Comprehensive integration and automation
Fathom's limited integration capabilities force users to manually transfer information between workplace systems. Circleback provides extensive integrations with major tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Linear, and many others through both native connections and platforms like Zapier. The platform's automation engine automatically routes meeting outcomes to the appropriate systems without manual intervention.
Mobile access and desktop support
Fathom users are restricted to desktop-only access, which creates problems for people who need to review meeting information while traveling. Circleback offers mobile apps for both iOS and Android, allowing users to record in-person meetings, review transcripts, and manage action items from anywhere. The platform also provides desktop applications for both Mac and Windows.
Botless meeting capture
Fathom relies on platform-specific recording methods, which can create technical limitations and administrative friction. Circleback offers botless meeting capture through its desktop app, which locally records meeting audio without requiring a virtual bot to join calls. This approach reduces setup complexity and avoids meeting admin permission issues.
No feature restrictions
Fathom users often switch away because important features are locked behind paywalls - the free plan limits AI summaries to 5 meetings per month, and advanced features like meeting templates require paid subscriptions. While Circleback doesn't offer a permanent free plan, all features are available across its paid tiers without artificial limitations based on usage volume.
Better meeting insights and search
Beyond basic transcription, Circleback provides AI-powered search capabilities that let users query their entire meeting history with natural language questions. Users can ask questions like "What did the client say about budget?" and get specific answers with references to exact meeting moments. This addresses Fathom's limitation of providing transcripts without meaningful insights or easy ways to retrieve specific information later.
These improvements make Circleback suitable for entire organizations rather than just individual users who need basic meeting transcription.
Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting
Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.
June 17, 2025
Fathom vs Circleback – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Compare Fathom vs Circleback for meeting transcription. Learn why users switch from Fathom's limited features to Circleback's advanced automation - integrations.
Users frequently complain about Fathom's limited functionality beyond basic transcription services. Many find that while the tool captures what was said in meetings, it fails to deliver meaningful insights or actionable next steps that would make meetings more productive. The lack of advanced features like automated action item detection and assignment leaves users manually sifting through transcripts to identify important tasks and follow-ups.
The accuracy issues with Fathom become particularly problematic in challenging audio environments or when multiple speakers are involved. Users report that the transcription quality drops significantly in noisy settings or when participants speak with accents, making the output unreliable for important business decisions. Speaker identification often fails, creating confusion about who said what and undermining accountability in team meetings.
Integration capabilities represent another major frustration point for Fathom users. The tool offers limited connections to popular workplace applications like CRMs, project management tools, and communication platforms, forcing users to manually transfer information between systems. This lack of workflow automation means users spend additional time on administrative tasks rather than focusing on strategic work that drives business results.
Circleback addresses these common pain points through technically superior transcription accuracy across over 100 languages with precise speaker identification, ensuring reliable meeting records even in challenging audio conditions. The platform automatically identifies and organizes action items with clear assignments, eliminating the manual work that frustrates Fathom users. Additionally, Circleback's powerful automation engine connects seamlessly with major workplace tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, and Linear, automatically routing meeting outcomes where they need to go without manual intervention.
For more detailed information about these user experiences, you can read: 1. Fathom offers a generous free plan and excels at basic meeting transcription and note-taking for online meetings. Users praise its intuitive interface, quick and accurate transcriptions, and excellent customer service. The AI-generated summaries appear within seconds of meeting completion, making it a solid time-saver for sales teams and general meeting participants.
However, Fathom has several limitations compared to more comprehensive solutions. It only works with scheduled online meetings on major platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet. The tool cannot handle in-person meetings, import external audio files, or provide the advanced automation capabilities that power users need.
Fathom falls short of Circleback in key areas including mobile app availability, in-person meeting support, and automation depth. While Fathom offers meeting templates only in paid tiers, it lacks the sophisticated workflow automation and extensive integrations that make Circleback suitable for entire organizations. The absence of external audio file support further limits its flexibility compared to Circleback's comprehensive meeting capture capabilities.
Advanced features like meeting templates are restricted to higher-tier plans, and some users find the on-screen widgets distracting during calls. The lack of mobile app support means users must rely on desktop applications exclusively. Despite these limitations, Fathom remains a solid choice for users seeking straightforward meeting transcription without complex automation needs.
Feature | Fathom | Circleback |
---|---|---|
In-person meetings | ❌ Online only | ✅ Full support |
Mobile app | ❌ Desktop only | ✅ iOS/Android |
External audio | ❌ Live only | ✅ File import |
Language support | ✅ 25+ languages | ✅ 100+ languages |
Free plan | ✅ Generous tier | ❌ Trial only |
Automation engine | ✅ Basic level | ✅ Advanced workflows |
CRM integrations | ✅ HubSpot/Salesforce | ✅ Multiple CRMs |
Desktop app | ✅ Mac/Windows | ✅ Mac/Windows |
Local recording | ✅ Platform specific | ✅ Full support |
Team features | ✅ Paid tiers | ✅ Built-in |
Why users switch away from Fathom
Users switch away from Fathom because important features are locked behind paywalls. While the free plan offers unlimited meeting recordings, you only get full AI summaries for 5 meetings per month, after which you're limited to basic transcripts. More advanced features like meeting templates with structured note sections are only available in the paid Team edition, forcing users to upgrade or look elsewhere if they need these capabilities.
The platform's limited flexibility creates friction for users with diverse workflow needs. Fathom only works with live meetings on specific platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams - you can't upload external audio files for transcription. This restriction means users who need to transcribe recorded interviews, phone calls, or other audio content must find alternative solutions, making Fathom unsuitable as a comprehensive transcription tool.
Technical limitations also drive users to seek alternatives. The lack of a mobile app means users are stuck with desktop-only access, which doesn't work for people who need to review meeting notes or summaries while traveling or away from their computer. Additionally, some users find the on-screen widgets and live transcript displays distracting during calls, and while these can be hidden, the visual clutter can disrupt the meeting experience for those who prefer cleaner interfaces.
FAQs
Does Fathom work for in-person meetings?
No, Fathom does not work for in-person meetings. It only works with scheduled online meetings on platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It cannot import external audio files, so you can't record in-person meetings and upload them later.
Does Fathom require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
The context doesn't specify whether Fathom uses a meeting bot, so I cannot answer this question.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Users generally praise the transcriptions as quick and accurate. However, the tool is limited to live meetings only and doesn't support uploading external audio files for transcription, which restricts its flexibility compared to some alternatives.
Does this tool help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, Fathom automatically generates action items after meetings and can even create draft follow-up emails. It also has an automation engine that can push action items to CRM deals. However, some advanced features like meeting templates with structured note sections are only available in paid Team plans, not the free version.
Does this tool integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Yes, Fathom integrates with CRM systems like HubSpot and Salesforce to sync call notes, and connects with Slack and Notion through Zapier. However, the most advanced integrations with CRM sync and admin controls are only available in the highest-tier Team Pro plan at $29 per user per month.
About Circleback
Circleback addresses several key problems that users experience with Fathom through more advanced functionality and broader platform support.
Improved meeting coverage and flexibility
While Fathom only works with scheduled online meetings on platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet, Circleback supports both online and in-person meetings. Users can record face-to-face conversations through Circleback's mobile app and import external audio files for transcription. This eliminates the restriction that forces Fathom users to find alternative solutions for recorded interviews, phone calls, or in-person meetings.
Enhanced transcription accuracy and language support
Fathom users report accuracy issues in noisy environments and with multiple speakers, particularly when participants have accents. Circleback addresses these concerns with superior transcription technology that maintains reliability even in challenging audio conditions. The platform supports over 100 languages compared to Fathom's 25+ languages, and includes precise speaker identification to ensure clear accountability about who said what.
Advanced action item management
Fathom users frequently complain about having to manually sift through transcripts to identify tasks and follow-ups. Circleback automatically identifies and organizes action items with clear assignments, eliminating this manual work. The platform structures these items in a way that makes them immediately actionable without requiring users to parse through meeting notes.
Comprehensive integration and automation
Fathom's limited integration capabilities force users to manually transfer information between workplace systems. Circleback provides extensive integrations with major tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Linear, and many others through both native connections and platforms like Zapier. The platform's automation engine automatically routes meeting outcomes to the appropriate systems without manual intervention.
Mobile access and desktop support
Fathom users are restricted to desktop-only access, which creates problems for people who need to review meeting information while traveling. Circleback offers mobile apps for both iOS and Android, allowing users to record in-person meetings, review transcripts, and manage action items from anywhere. The platform also provides desktop applications for both Mac and Windows.
Botless meeting capture
Fathom relies on platform-specific recording methods, which can create technical limitations and administrative friction. Circleback offers botless meeting capture through its desktop app, which locally records meeting audio without requiring a virtual bot to join calls. This approach reduces setup complexity and avoids meeting admin permission issues.
No feature restrictions
Fathom users often switch away because important features are locked behind paywalls - the free plan limits AI summaries to 5 meetings per month, and advanced features like meeting templates require paid subscriptions. While Circleback doesn't offer a permanent free plan, all features are available across its paid tiers without artificial limitations based on usage volume.
Better meeting insights and search
Beyond basic transcription, Circleback provides AI-powered search capabilities that let users query their entire meeting history with natural language questions. Users can ask questions like "What did the client say about budget?" and get specific answers with references to exact meeting moments. This addresses Fathom's limitation of providing transcripts without meaningful insights or easy ways to retrieve specific information later.
These improvements make Circleback suitable for entire organizations rather than just individual users who need basic meeting transcription.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.
June 17, 2025
Fathom vs Circleback – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Compare Fathom vs Circleback for meeting transcription. Learn why users switch from Fathom's limited features to Circleback's advanced automation - integrations.
Users frequently complain about Fathom's limited functionality beyond basic transcription services. Many find that while the tool captures what was said in meetings, it fails to deliver meaningful insights or actionable next steps that would make meetings more productive. The lack of advanced features like automated action item detection and assignment leaves users manually sifting through transcripts to identify important tasks and follow-ups.
The accuracy issues with Fathom become particularly problematic in challenging audio environments or when multiple speakers are involved. Users report that the transcription quality drops significantly in noisy settings or when participants speak with accents, making the output unreliable for important business decisions. Speaker identification often fails, creating confusion about who said what and undermining accountability in team meetings.
Integration capabilities represent another major frustration point for Fathom users. The tool offers limited connections to popular workplace applications like CRMs, project management tools, and communication platforms, forcing users to manually transfer information between systems. This lack of workflow automation means users spend additional time on administrative tasks rather than focusing on strategic work that drives business results.
Circleback addresses these common pain points through technically superior transcription accuracy across over 100 languages with precise speaker identification, ensuring reliable meeting records even in challenging audio conditions. The platform automatically identifies and organizes action items with clear assignments, eliminating the manual work that frustrates Fathom users. Additionally, Circleback's powerful automation engine connects seamlessly with major workplace tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, and Linear, automatically routing meeting outcomes where they need to go without manual intervention.
For more detailed information about these user experiences, you can read: 1. Fathom offers a generous free plan and excels at basic meeting transcription and note-taking for online meetings. Users praise its intuitive interface, quick and accurate transcriptions, and excellent customer service. The AI-generated summaries appear within seconds of meeting completion, making it a solid time-saver for sales teams and general meeting participants.
However, Fathom has several limitations compared to more comprehensive solutions. It only works with scheduled online meetings on major platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet. The tool cannot handle in-person meetings, import external audio files, or provide the advanced automation capabilities that power users need.
Fathom falls short of Circleback in key areas including mobile app availability, in-person meeting support, and automation depth. While Fathom offers meeting templates only in paid tiers, it lacks the sophisticated workflow automation and extensive integrations that make Circleback suitable for entire organizations. The absence of external audio file support further limits its flexibility compared to Circleback's comprehensive meeting capture capabilities.
Advanced features like meeting templates are restricted to higher-tier plans, and some users find the on-screen widgets distracting during calls. The lack of mobile app support means users must rely on desktop applications exclusively. Despite these limitations, Fathom remains a solid choice for users seeking straightforward meeting transcription without complex automation needs.
Feature | Fathom | Circleback |
---|---|---|
In-person meetings | ❌ Online only | ✅ Full support |
Mobile app | ❌ Desktop only | ✅ iOS/Android |
External audio | ❌ Live only | ✅ File import |
Language support | ✅ 25+ languages | ✅ 100+ languages |
Free plan | ✅ Generous tier | ❌ Trial only |
Automation engine | ✅ Basic level | ✅ Advanced workflows |
CRM integrations | ✅ HubSpot/Salesforce | ✅ Multiple CRMs |
Desktop app | ✅ Mac/Windows | ✅ Mac/Windows |
Local recording | ✅ Platform specific | ✅ Full support |
Team features | ✅ Paid tiers | ✅ Built-in |
Why users switch away from Fathom
Users switch away from Fathom because important features are locked behind paywalls. While the free plan offers unlimited meeting recordings, you only get full AI summaries for 5 meetings per month, after which you're limited to basic transcripts. More advanced features like meeting templates with structured note sections are only available in the paid Team edition, forcing users to upgrade or look elsewhere if they need these capabilities.
The platform's limited flexibility creates friction for users with diverse workflow needs. Fathom only works with live meetings on specific platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams - you can't upload external audio files for transcription. This restriction means users who need to transcribe recorded interviews, phone calls, or other audio content must find alternative solutions, making Fathom unsuitable as a comprehensive transcription tool.
Technical limitations also drive users to seek alternatives. The lack of a mobile app means users are stuck with desktop-only access, which doesn't work for people who need to review meeting notes or summaries while traveling or away from their computer. Additionally, some users find the on-screen widgets and live transcript displays distracting during calls, and while these can be hidden, the visual clutter can disrupt the meeting experience for those who prefer cleaner interfaces.
FAQs
Does Fathom work for in-person meetings?
No, Fathom does not work for in-person meetings. It only works with scheduled online meetings on platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams. It cannot import external audio files, so you can't record in-person meetings and upload them later.
Does Fathom require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
The context doesn't specify whether Fathom uses a meeting bot, so I cannot answer this question.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Users generally praise the transcriptions as quick and accurate. However, the tool is limited to live meetings only and doesn't support uploading external audio files for transcription, which restricts its flexibility compared to some alternatives.
Does this tool help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, Fathom automatically generates action items after meetings and can even create draft follow-up emails. It also has an automation engine that can push action items to CRM deals. However, some advanced features like meeting templates with structured note sections are only available in paid Team plans, not the free version.
Does this tool integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Yes, Fathom integrates with CRM systems like HubSpot and Salesforce to sync call notes, and connects with Slack and Notion through Zapier. However, the most advanced integrations with CRM sync and admin controls are only available in the highest-tier Team Pro plan at $29 per user per month.
About Circleback
Circleback addresses several key problems that users experience with Fathom through more advanced functionality and broader platform support.
Improved meeting coverage and flexibility
While Fathom only works with scheduled online meetings on platforms like Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet, Circleback supports both online and in-person meetings. Users can record face-to-face conversations through Circleback's mobile app and import external audio files for transcription. This eliminates the restriction that forces Fathom users to find alternative solutions for recorded interviews, phone calls, or in-person meetings.
Enhanced transcription accuracy and language support
Fathom users report accuracy issues in noisy environments and with multiple speakers, particularly when participants have accents. Circleback addresses these concerns with superior transcription technology that maintains reliability even in challenging audio conditions. The platform supports over 100 languages compared to Fathom's 25+ languages, and includes precise speaker identification to ensure clear accountability about who said what.
Advanced action item management
Fathom users frequently complain about having to manually sift through transcripts to identify tasks and follow-ups. Circleback automatically identifies and organizes action items with clear assignments, eliminating this manual work. The platform structures these items in a way that makes them immediately actionable without requiring users to parse through meeting notes.
Comprehensive integration and automation
Fathom's limited integration capabilities force users to manually transfer information between workplace systems. Circleback provides extensive integrations with major tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Linear, and many others through both native connections and platforms like Zapier. The platform's automation engine automatically routes meeting outcomes to the appropriate systems without manual intervention.
Mobile access and desktop support
Fathom users are restricted to desktop-only access, which creates problems for people who need to review meeting information while traveling. Circleback offers mobile apps for both iOS and Android, allowing users to record in-person meetings, review transcripts, and manage action items from anywhere. The platform also provides desktop applications for both Mac and Windows.
Botless meeting capture
Fathom relies on platform-specific recording methods, which can create technical limitations and administrative friction. Circleback offers botless meeting capture through its desktop app, which locally records meeting audio without requiring a virtual bot to join calls. This approach reduces setup complexity and avoids meeting admin permission issues.
No feature restrictions
Fathom users often switch away because important features are locked behind paywalls - the free plan limits AI summaries to 5 meetings per month, and advanced features like meeting templates require paid subscriptions. While Circleback doesn't offer a permanent free plan, all features are available across its paid tiers without artificial limitations based on usage volume.
Better meeting insights and search
Beyond basic transcription, Circleback provides AI-powered search capabilities that let users query their entire meeting history with natural language questions. Users can ask questions like "What did the client say about budget?" and get specific answers with references to exact meeting moments. This addresses Fathom's limitation of providing transcripts without meaningful insights or easy ways to retrieve specific information later.
These improvements make Circleback suitable for entire organizations rather than just individual users who need basic meeting transcription.
Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting
Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.