/

/

Notion Meeting Recorder vs Otter.ai – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?

June 17, 2025

Notion Meeting Recorder vs Otter.ai – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?

Notion meeting recorder works best for teams already in the Notion ecosystem while Otter.ai offers cross-platform transcription - both have limitations for business integration

Notion meeting recorder excels for teams already embedded in the Notion ecosystem, offering seamless integration where meeting notes automatically become part of your existing workspace structure. The tool generates actionable summaries and tasks directly within Notion pages, eliminating context switching between different applications. However, it requires significant Notion adoption to be worthwhile and adds $10 per user monthly on top of existing plan costs, making it less suitable for teams not already committed to Notion's platform.

Otter.ai provides a straightforward meeting transcription solution that works across multiple platforms through bot integration with popular video conferencing tools. Its user-friendly interface and real-time transcription capabilities make it accessible for various use cases from business meetings to interviews. The service struggles with transcription accuracy during complex conversations and limits usage on the free tier, while its AI-generated summaries often require manual cleanup to be truly useful.

Notion meeting recorder targets teams that manage projects, tasks, and documentation primarily within Notion, particularly those seeking to consolidate their entire workflow in one platform. Otter.ai suits organizations looking for a dedicated transcription service without commitment to a specific productivity ecosystem, especially those needing basic meeting documentation across different tools and platforms. Both audiences benefit from automated note-taking, though each tool serves different organizational structures and workflow preferences.

Both tools reveal limitations in their ability to meaningfully connect meeting outcomes to broader business processes, offering basic integrations that require manual effort to translate insights into action. While they excel at capturing and summarizing conversations, neither provides sophisticated automation or deep third-party connections that would help users systematically follow through on meeting decisions. Users often find themselves with well-organized meeting notes but still face the challenge of ensuring those notes drive actual productivity and accountability within their existing business systems.

Comparison table

Feature

Notion meeting recorder

Otter.ai

In-person support

✅ Full support

✅ Full support

Local recording

✅ Yes

✅ Partial

Desktop app

✅ Mac/Windows

❌ Web only

Mobile apps

✅ iOS/Android

✅ iOS/Android

Free plan

❌ Trial only

✅ 300 min/month

Language support

✅ 16 languages

✅ English/French/Spanish

Security compliance

✅ SOC 2

✅ SOC 2

Automation engine

✅ Smart summaries

❌ Basic only

Third-party integrations

❌ Notion only

✅ Zoom/Meet

Pricing

$8-10/user/month

$8.33-20/user/month

What users say about Notion meeting recorder and Otter.ai

Notion meeting recorder offers a convenient recording feature for users already embedded in the Notion ecosystem, but it has significant limitations as a comprehensive meeting solution. According to user feedback, while it's a clever, lightweight feature, the tool falls short of expectations for professional use cases. Reviews indicate that this is not a serious meeting assistant and functions more as a basic recording tool rather than a full-featured meeting management solution.

Otter.ai receives more positive feedback from users, particularly for its real-time transcription capabilities and user-friendly interface. User reviews consistently highlight that Otter is an easy-to-use tool that transcribes meetings live, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. The platform's AI chat functionality stands out as a particularly valuable feature, with users noting that the tool becomes especially powerful when utilized during live meetings rather than just for post-meeting analysis.

Users switch away from Notion meeting recorder primarily due to its integration limitations with existing workflows outside the Notion ecosystem. While the tool excels for teams already heavily invested in Notion, it creates significant friction for users who rely on other systems. Many find themselves caught in what reviewers describe as a "build your setup" trap, where getting the most value requires extensive configuration of Notion pages and databases. The tool assumes users manage all their tasks and notes within Notion, making it less practical for teams using diverse productivity tools or established workflows in other platforms.

Cost concerns represent another major reason for users to seek alternatives. Notion's AI meeting notes requires a paid add-on of $10 per user per month (or $8 annually), which some users find difficult to justify on top of existing plan fees. This pricing structure means teams must pay additional fees beyond their base Notion subscription, and every user who wants AI transcription capabilities needs the add-on. For organizations already using other meeting tools or those seeking a standalone solution, this cost can seem excessive compared to alternatives that offer meeting recording as part of their core features.

Technical limitations and dependency on the Notion ecosystem also drive users away. Unlike dedicated meeting tools that use bots to join calls automatically, Notion relies on device audio capture, which can fail if the audio setup isn't properly configured, potentially resulting in missed notes. Additionally, users switching to alternatives to Otter.ai often cite better standalone functionality, dedicated meeting bot integration with platforms like Zoom and Teams, and more flexible export options that don't require maintaining an entire Notion workspace structure.

One major reason users switch away from Otter.ai is due to its transcription accuracy issues. Many users report that the transcription quality drops significantly when dealing with names, accents, or situations with multiple people talking at once (crosstalk). This creates frustration as users still need to spend time cleaning up and correcting the AI-generated notes, which undermines the primary benefit of automated transcription that should save them time.

Another key factor driving users away is the restrictive limitations of Otter.ai's free plan and the cost structure of paid plans. The free version only provides 300 minutes of transcription per month with a 30-minute limit per meeting, which many users find insufficient for their needs. When they need to upgrade, the pricing jumps to $8.33 per user per month for the Pro plan, and the formatting of exports can still be messy even on paid plans, making users question the value they're receiving.

Users also switch due to Otter.ai's limited integration capabilities and lack of robust workflow automation. While it offers basic integrations with platforms like Zoom and Google Meet, it lacks native integrations with popular productivity tools like CRM systems or Notion, requiring users to manually export data or use APIs for connections. Additionally, Otter.ai doesn't provide a built-in workflow engine and focuses primarily on transcription rather than offering comprehensive meeting management features, leaving users who need more sophisticated automation and task management capabilities looking for alternative solutions.

Using Notion meeting recorder

Does Notion meeting recorder work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Notion meeting recorder works for in-person meetings. It can capture in-person discussions using your device's microphone, and you can set your phone or laptop in a conference room to transcribe the conversation. The mobile app (iOS and Android) also supports recording meetings, making it useful for recording in-person meetings on the go.

Does Notion meeting recorder require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

No, Notion meeting recorder does not require a meeting bot to join the meeting. Unlike some dedicated meeting tools, it doesn't have a live "bot" joining calls. Instead, it relies on your device's audio and records locally from your computer, capturing system output and microphone input directly.

What do users say about the quality of Notion meeting recorder transcriptions?

Users report positive feedback about transcription quality. Early users note that Notion's AI does a good job extracting key points from dense conversations and making them accessible and actionable for the team. Users appreciate the swift summaries and action-item generation, which allows them to focus on discussions instead of taking notes manually while ensuring nothing gets forgotten.

How does Notion meeting recorder help users follow up on action items?

After a meeting ends, Notion automatically generates a summary plus a list of next steps from the transcribed conversation. These action items can be converted into checkboxes, assigned to owners, or moved into your task database within Notion with minimal manual effort. All notes, decisions, and next steps are captured in a Notion page where they can be immediately shared or turned into tasks and projects.

Does Notion meeting recorder integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Notion meeting recorder does not directly integrate with third-party CRMs or external software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear out-of-the-box. The focus is on keeping everything within Notion rather than exporting to external software. However, you could potentially route Notion pages with meeting notes to other systems via Notion's API or tools like Zapier, but this would require manual setup rather than native integration.

Using Otter.ai

Does Otter.ai work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Otter.ai works for in-person meetings through its mobile app, which can record any conversation (in-person or remote) and transcribe it. The mobile app is often used for on-site interviews and meetings.

Does Otter.ai require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

For online meetings, yes - Otter.ai uses an AI bot that joins Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet calls to record and transcribe. However, for in-person meetings, the mobile app records device audio directly without needing a bot.

What do users say about the quality of Otter.ai transcriptions?

Users report mixed experiences with transcription quality. While many appreciate the easy-to-use interface and helpful meeting summaries, transcription accuracy can drop with names, accents, or crosstalk. AI-generated notes sometimes require cleanup, and formatting of exports can be messy.

How does Otter.ai help users follow up on action items?

Otter.ai provides automated summaries with action items and offers some basic task tagging functionality to identify action items from meetings. However, it doesn't have a full workflow engine - it focuses primarily on transcription and notes rather than comprehensive task management.

Does Otter.ai integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Otter.ai does not have native CRM integrations. While it integrates with platforms like Zoom and Google Meet for recording, and offers calendar sync with export options to txt and PDF formats, integration with CRMs like HubSpot or Salesforce would require manual export or API usage only.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

  • Automatically-identified and assigned action items

  • AI-enabled search across all meetings

  • Automations with 100+ app integrations

  • Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

  • Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps

Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting

Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.

Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.

/

/

Notion Meeting Recorder vs Otter.ai – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?

June 17, 2025

Notion Meeting Recorder vs Otter.ai – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?

Notion meeting recorder works best for teams already in the Notion ecosystem while Otter.ai offers cross-platform transcription - both have limitations for business integration

Notion meeting recorder excels for teams already embedded in the Notion ecosystem, offering seamless integration where meeting notes automatically become part of your existing workspace structure. The tool generates actionable summaries and tasks directly within Notion pages, eliminating context switching between different applications. However, it requires significant Notion adoption to be worthwhile and adds $10 per user monthly on top of existing plan costs, making it less suitable for teams not already committed to Notion's platform.

Otter.ai provides a straightforward meeting transcription solution that works across multiple platforms through bot integration with popular video conferencing tools. Its user-friendly interface and real-time transcription capabilities make it accessible for various use cases from business meetings to interviews. The service struggles with transcription accuracy during complex conversations and limits usage on the free tier, while its AI-generated summaries often require manual cleanup to be truly useful.

Notion meeting recorder targets teams that manage projects, tasks, and documentation primarily within Notion, particularly those seeking to consolidate their entire workflow in one platform. Otter.ai suits organizations looking for a dedicated transcription service without commitment to a specific productivity ecosystem, especially those needing basic meeting documentation across different tools and platforms. Both audiences benefit from automated note-taking, though each tool serves different organizational structures and workflow preferences.

Both tools reveal limitations in their ability to meaningfully connect meeting outcomes to broader business processes, offering basic integrations that require manual effort to translate insights into action. While they excel at capturing and summarizing conversations, neither provides sophisticated automation or deep third-party connections that would help users systematically follow through on meeting decisions. Users often find themselves with well-organized meeting notes but still face the challenge of ensuring those notes drive actual productivity and accountability within their existing business systems.

Comparison table

Feature

Notion meeting recorder

Otter.ai

In-person support

✅ Full support

✅ Full support

Local recording

✅ Yes

✅ Partial

Desktop app

✅ Mac/Windows

❌ Web only

Mobile apps

✅ iOS/Android

✅ iOS/Android

Free plan

❌ Trial only

✅ 300 min/month

Language support

✅ 16 languages

✅ English/French/Spanish

Security compliance

✅ SOC 2

✅ SOC 2

Automation engine

✅ Smart summaries

❌ Basic only

Third-party integrations

❌ Notion only

✅ Zoom/Meet

Pricing

$8-10/user/month

$8.33-20/user/month

What users say about Notion meeting recorder and Otter.ai

Notion meeting recorder offers a convenient recording feature for users already embedded in the Notion ecosystem, but it has significant limitations as a comprehensive meeting solution. According to user feedback, while it's a clever, lightweight feature, the tool falls short of expectations for professional use cases. Reviews indicate that this is not a serious meeting assistant and functions more as a basic recording tool rather than a full-featured meeting management solution.

Otter.ai receives more positive feedback from users, particularly for its real-time transcription capabilities and user-friendly interface. User reviews consistently highlight that Otter is an easy-to-use tool that transcribes meetings live, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. The platform's AI chat functionality stands out as a particularly valuable feature, with users noting that the tool becomes especially powerful when utilized during live meetings rather than just for post-meeting analysis.

Users switch away from Notion meeting recorder primarily due to its integration limitations with existing workflows outside the Notion ecosystem. While the tool excels for teams already heavily invested in Notion, it creates significant friction for users who rely on other systems. Many find themselves caught in what reviewers describe as a "build your setup" trap, where getting the most value requires extensive configuration of Notion pages and databases. The tool assumes users manage all their tasks and notes within Notion, making it less practical for teams using diverse productivity tools or established workflows in other platforms.

Cost concerns represent another major reason for users to seek alternatives. Notion's AI meeting notes requires a paid add-on of $10 per user per month (or $8 annually), which some users find difficult to justify on top of existing plan fees. This pricing structure means teams must pay additional fees beyond their base Notion subscription, and every user who wants AI transcription capabilities needs the add-on. For organizations already using other meeting tools or those seeking a standalone solution, this cost can seem excessive compared to alternatives that offer meeting recording as part of their core features.

Technical limitations and dependency on the Notion ecosystem also drive users away. Unlike dedicated meeting tools that use bots to join calls automatically, Notion relies on device audio capture, which can fail if the audio setup isn't properly configured, potentially resulting in missed notes. Additionally, users switching to alternatives to Otter.ai often cite better standalone functionality, dedicated meeting bot integration with platforms like Zoom and Teams, and more flexible export options that don't require maintaining an entire Notion workspace structure.

One major reason users switch away from Otter.ai is due to its transcription accuracy issues. Many users report that the transcription quality drops significantly when dealing with names, accents, or situations with multiple people talking at once (crosstalk). This creates frustration as users still need to spend time cleaning up and correcting the AI-generated notes, which undermines the primary benefit of automated transcription that should save them time.

Another key factor driving users away is the restrictive limitations of Otter.ai's free plan and the cost structure of paid plans. The free version only provides 300 minutes of transcription per month with a 30-minute limit per meeting, which many users find insufficient for their needs. When they need to upgrade, the pricing jumps to $8.33 per user per month for the Pro plan, and the formatting of exports can still be messy even on paid plans, making users question the value they're receiving.

Users also switch due to Otter.ai's limited integration capabilities and lack of robust workflow automation. While it offers basic integrations with platforms like Zoom and Google Meet, it lacks native integrations with popular productivity tools like CRM systems or Notion, requiring users to manually export data or use APIs for connections. Additionally, Otter.ai doesn't provide a built-in workflow engine and focuses primarily on transcription rather than offering comprehensive meeting management features, leaving users who need more sophisticated automation and task management capabilities looking for alternative solutions.

Using Notion meeting recorder

Does Notion meeting recorder work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Notion meeting recorder works for in-person meetings. It can capture in-person discussions using your device's microphone, and you can set your phone or laptop in a conference room to transcribe the conversation. The mobile app (iOS and Android) also supports recording meetings, making it useful for recording in-person meetings on the go.

Does Notion meeting recorder require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

No, Notion meeting recorder does not require a meeting bot to join the meeting. Unlike some dedicated meeting tools, it doesn't have a live "bot" joining calls. Instead, it relies on your device's audio and records locally from your computer, capturing system output and microphone input directly.

What do users say about the quality of Notion meeting recorder transcriptions?

Users report positive feedback about transcription quality. Early users note that Notion's AI does a good job extracting key points from dense conversations and making them accessible and actionable for the team. Users appreciate the swift summaries and action-item generation, which allows them to focus on discussions instead of taking notes manually while ensuring nothing gets forgotten.

How does Notion meeting recorder help users follow up on action items?

After a meeting ends, Notion automatically generates a summary plus a list of next steps from the transcribed conversation. These action items can be converted into checkboxes, assigned to owners, or moved into your task database within Notion with minimal manual effort. All notes, decisions, and next steps are captured in a Notion page where they can be immediately shared or turned into tasks and projects.

Does Notion meeting recorder integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Notion meeting recorder does not directly integrate with third-party CRMs or external software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear out-of-the-box. The focus is on keeping everything within Notion rather than exporting to external software. However, you could potentially route Notion pages with meeting notes to other systems via Notion's API or tools like Zapier, but this would require manual setup rather than native integration.

Using Otter.ai

Does Otter.ai work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Otter.ai works for in-person meetings through its mobile app, which can record any conversation (in-person or remote) and transcribe it. The mobile app is often used for on-site interviews and meetings.

Does Otter.ai require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

For online meetings, yes - Otter.ai uses an AI bot that joins Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet calls to record and transcribe. However, for in-person meetings, the mobile app records device audio directly without needing a bot.

What do users say about the quality of Otter.ai transcriptions?

Users report mixed experiences with transcription quality. While many appreciate the easy-to-use interface and helpful meeting summaries, transcription accuracy can drop with names, accents, or crosstalk. AI-generated notes sometimes require cleanup, and formatting of exports can be messy.

How does Otter.ai help users follow up on action items?

Otter.ai provides automated summaries with action items and offers some basic task tagging functionality to identify action items from meetings. However, it doesn't have a full workflow engine - it focuses primarily on transcription and notes rather than comprehensive task management.

Does Otter.ai integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Otter.ai does not have native CRM integrations. While it integrates with platforms like Zoom and Google Meet for recording, and offers calendar sync with export options to txt and PDF formats, integration with CRMs like HubSpot or Salesforce would require manual export or API usage only.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

  • Automatically-identified and assigned action items

  • AI-enabled search across all meetings

  • Automations with 100+ app integrations

  • Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

  • Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps

Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.

/

/

Notion Meeting Recorder vs Otter.ai – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?

June 17, 2025

Notion Meeting Recorder vs Otter.ai – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?

Notion meeting recorder works best for teams already in the Notion ecosystem while Otter.ai offers cross-platform transcription - both have limitations for business integration

Notion meeting recorder excels for teams already embedded in the Notion ecosystem, offering seamless integration where meeting notes automatically become part of your existing workspace structure. The tool generates actionable summaries and tasks directly within Notion pages, eliminating context switching between different applications. However, it requires significant Notion adoption to be worthwhile and adds $10 per user monthly on top of existing plan costs, making it less suitable for teams not already committed to Notion's platform.

Otter.ai provides a straightforward meeting transcription solution that works across multiple platforms through bot integration with popular video conferencing tools. Its user-friendly interface and real-time transcription capabilities make it accessible for various use cases from business meetings to interviews. The service struggles with transcription accuracy during complex conversations and limits usage on the free tier, while its AI-generated summaries often require manual cleanup to be truly useful.

Notion meeting recorder targets teams that manage projects, tasks, and documentation primarily within Notion, particularly those seeking to consolidate their entire workflow in one platform. Otter.ai suits organizations looking for a dedicated transcription service without commitment to a specific productivity ecosystem, especially those needing basic meeting documentation across different tools and platforms. Both audiences benefit from automated note-taking, though each tool serves different organizational structures and workflow preferences.

Both tools reveal limitations in their ability to meaningfully connect meeting outcomes to broader business processes, offering basic integrations that require manual effort to translate insights into action. While they excel at capturing and summarizing conversations, neither provides sophisticated automation or deep third-party connections that would help users systematically follow through on meeting decisions. Users often find themselves with well-organized meeting notes but still face the challenge of ensuring those notes drive actual productivity and accountability within their existing business systems.

Comparison table

Feature

Notion meeting recorder

Otter.ai

In-person support

✅ Full support

✅ Full support

Local recording

✅ Yes

✅ Partial

Desktop app

✅ Mac/Windows

❌ Web only

Mobile apps

✅ iOS/Android

✅ iOS/Android

Free plan

❌ Trial only

✅ 300 min/month

Language support

✅ 16 languages

✅ English/French/Spanish

Security compliance

✅ SOC 2

✅ SOC 2

Automation engine

✅ Smart summaries

❌ Basic only

Third-party integrations

❌ Notion only

✅ Zoom/Meet

Pricing

$8-10/user/month

$8.33-20/user/month

What users say about Notion meeting recorder and Otter.ai

Notion meeting recorder offers a convenient recording feature for users already embedded in the Notion ecosystem, but it has significant limitations as a comprehensive meeting solution. According to user feedback, while it's a clever, lightweight feature, the tool falls short of expectations for professional use cases. Reviews indicate that this is not a serious meeting assistant and functions more as a basic recording tool rather than a full-featured meeting management solution.

Otter.ai receives more positive feedback from users, particularly for its real-time transcription capabilities and user-friendly interface. User reviews consistently highlight that Otter is an easy-to-use tool that transcribes meetings live, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. The platform's AI chat functionality stands out as a particularly valuable feature, with users noting that the tool becomes especially powerful when utilized during live meetings rather than just for post-meeting analysis.

Users switch away from Notion meeting recorder primarily due to its integration limitations with existing workflows outside the Notion ecosystem. While the tool excels for teams already heavily invested in Notion, it creates significant friction for users who rely on other systems. Many find themselves caught in what reviewers describe as a "build your setup" trap, where getting the most value requires extensive configuration of Notion pages and databases. The tool assumes users manage all their tasks and notes within Notion, making it less practical for teams using diverse productivity tools or established workflows in other platforms.

Cost concerns represent another major reason for users to seek alternatives. Notion's AI meeting notes requires a paid add-on of $10 per user per month (or $8 annually), which some users find difficult to justify on top of existing plan fees. This pricing structure means teams must pay additional fees beyond their base Notion subscription, and every user who wants AI transcription capabilities needs the add-on. For organizations already using other meeting tools or those seeking a standalone solution, this cost can seem excessive compared to alternatives that offer meeting recording as part of their core features.

Technical limitations and dependency on the Notion ecosystem also drive users away. Unlike dedicated meeting tools that use bots to join calls automatically, Notion relies on device audio capture, which can fail if the audio setup isn't properly configured, potentially resulting in missed notes. Additionally, users switching to alternatives to Otter.ai often cite better standalone functionality, dedicated meeting bot integration with platforms like Zoom and Teams, and more flexible export options that don't require maintaining an entire Notion workspace structure.

One major reason users switch away from Otter.ai is due to its transcription accuracy issues. Many users report that the transcription quality drops significantly when dealing with names, accents, or situations with multiple people talking at once (crosstalk). This creates frustration as users still need to spend time cleaning up and correcting the AI-generated notes, which undermines the primary benefit of automated transcription that should save them time.

Another key factor driving users away is the restrictive limitations of Otter.ai's free plan and the cost structure of paid plans. The free version only provides 300 minutes of transcription per month with a 30-minute limit per meeting, which many users find insufficient for their needs. When they need to upgrade, the pricing jumps to $8.33 per user per month for the Pro plan, and the formatting of exports can still be messy even on paid plans, making users question the value they're receiving.

Users also switch due to Otter.ai's limited integration capabilities and lack of robust workflow automation. While it offers basic integrations with platforms like Zoom and Google Meet, it lacks native integrations with popular productivity tools like CRM systems or Notion, requiring users to manually export data or use APIs for connections. Additionally, Otter.ai doesn't provide a built-in workflow engine and focuses primarily on transcription rather than offering comprehensive meeting management features, leaving users who need more sophisticated automation and task management capabilities looking for alternative solutions.

Using Notion meeting recorder

Does Notion meeting recorder work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Notion meeting recorder works for in-person meetings. It can capture in-person discussions using your device's microphone, and you can set your phone or laptop in a conference room to transcribe the conversation. The mobile app (iOS and Android) also supports recording meetings, making it useful for recording in-person meetings on the go.

Does Notion meeting recorder require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

No, Notion meeting recorder does not require a meeting bot to join the meeting. Unlike some dedicated meeting tools, it doesn't have a live "bot" joining calls. Instead, it relies on your device's audio and records locally from your computer, capturing system output and microphone input directly.

What do users say about the quality of Notion meeting recorder transcriptions?

Users report positive feedback about transcription quality. Early users note that Notion's AI does a good job extracting key points from dense conversations and making them accessible and actionable for the team. Users appreciate the swift summaries and action-item generation, which allows them to focus on discussions instead of taking notes manually while ensuring nothing gets forgotten.

How does Notion meeting recorder help users follow up on action items?

After a meeting ends, Notion automatically generates a summary plus a list of next steps from the transcribed conversation. These action items can be converted into checkboxes, assigned to owners, or moved into your task database within Notion with minimal manual effort. All notes, decisions, and next steps are captured in a Notion page where they can be immediately shared or turned into tasks and projects.

Does Notion meeting recorder integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Notion meeting recorder does not directly integrate with third-party CRMs or external software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear out-of-the-box. The focus is on keeping everything within Notion rather than exporting to external software. However, you could potentially route Notion pages with meeting notes to other systems via Notion's API or tools like Zapier, but this would require manual setup rather than native integration.

Using Otter.ai

Does Otter.ai work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Otter.ai works for in-person meetings through its mobile app, which can record any conversation (in-person or remote) and transcribe it. The mobile app is often used for on-site interviews and meetings.

Does Otter.ai require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

For online meetings, yes - Otter.ai uses an AI bot that joins Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet calls to record and transcribe. However, for in-person meetings, the mobile app records device audio directly without needing a bot.

What do users say about the quality of Otter.ai transcriptions?

Users report mixed experiences with transcription quality. While many appreciate the easy-to-use interface and helpful meeting summaries, transcription accuracy can drop with names, accents, or crosstalk. AI-generated notes sometimes require cleanup, and formatting of exports can be messy.

How does Otter.ai help users follow up on action items?

Otter.ai provides automated summaries with action items and offers some basic task tagging functionality to identify action items from meetings. However, it doesn't have a full workflow engine - it focuses primarily on transcription and notes rather than comprehensive task management.

Does Otter.ai integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Otter.ai does not have native CRM integrations. While it integrates with platforms like Zoom and Google Meet for recording, and offers calendar sync with export options to txt and PDF formats, integration with CRMs like HubSpot or Salesforce would require manual export or API usage only.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

  • Automatically-identified and assigned action items

  • AI-enabled search across all meetings

  • Automations with 100+ app integrations

  • Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

  • Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps

Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting

Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.

Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.