Read.ai users frequently report serious security and privacy issues that make the platform unreliable for business use. Many users complain that Read.ai continues to join their meetings without permission, even after they've deleted their accounts or explicitly removed access. This unauthorized meeting access creates significant privacy concerns and disrupts professional calls. The platform has earned a concerning 1.7 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot from 62 reviews, indicating widespread user dissatisfaction.

Users also struggle with Read.ai's poor accuracy and transcription quality, which makes the meeting notes unreliable for important business decisions. The platform often misidentifies speakers and produces transcripts with errors that require extensive manual correction. Many users find that they can't trust the output without spending time verifying and fixing the content, which defeats the purpose of using an automated tool.

The combination of security issues and accuracy problems has led many users to abandon Read.ai entirely, seeking more reliable alternatives. Users report feeling frustrated with the lack of control over their data and the inconsistent performance that makes the tool more of a liability than an asset. The platform's reputation continues to decline as more users share negative experiences about unauthorized access and unreliable meeting capture.

In contrast, Circleback addresses these exact pain points that drive users away from Read.ai. Where Read.ai has security issues with unauthorized meeting access, Circleback offers SOC 2 Type II certification, HIPAA compliance, and explicit guarantees that customer data isn't used for AI training. While Read.ai produces unreliable transcripts that require manual verification, Circleback delivers 95%+ accuracy with precise speaker identification across 100+ languages, ensuring you can trust the output without double-checking. Instead of the invasive bot approach that Read.ai users complain about, Circleback offers botless recording through its desktop app, giving you complete control over when and how meetings are captured.

1 2

Read.ai offers a comprehensive meeting analysis platform that goes beyond basic transcription. The tool provides real-time insights during meetings and generates detailed post-meeting reports with engagement metrics. It supports over 20 languages and integrates seamlessly with major video conferencing platforms, earning recognition as a Zoom Essential App.

Users praise Read.ai's rich feature set, particularly its unique ability to analyze meeting quality through engagement scores and speaker balance metrics. The smart summaries effectively capture questions and discussion topics, while workflow integrations automatically sync meeting content to tools like Slack and Notion. The platform's multilingual support and real-time translation capabilities make it valuable for global teams.

However, Read.ai has notable limitations that affect user experience. The free tier restricts users to only 5 meetings per month, which is quite restrictive compared to competitors. The interface can be complex and cluttered, creating a steeper learning curve, while privacy concerns exist around joining meetings without explicit consent from all participants.

Read.ai falls short of Circleback in several key areas. Unlike Circleback's botless recording and comprehensive automation engine, Read.ai relies on traditional meeting bots and offers only partial automation through its AI Copilot. Circleback provides superior transcription accuracy, supports 100+ languages versus Read.ai's 20+, and offers both desktop and mobile apps across all platforms, while Read.ai lacks a desktop app and Android support.

Why users switch away from Read.ai

One major reason users abandon Read.ai is the restrictive free tier that only allows 5 meetings per month with full notes. This limitation feels too constraining compared to what competitors offer, forcing users to either upgrade quickly or look elsewhere for their meeting transcription needs.

The interface complexity creates another barrier that drives users away. With numerous features packed into one platform - including notes, analytics, and search functions - many users find the experience cluttered and confusing. The steep learning curve means the tool doesn't deliver the time-saving benefits people expect, leading them to seek simpler alternatives.

Privacy concerns also push users toward other solutions. Some people feel uncomfortable about Read.ai joining meetings without explicit consent from all participants, viewing this as crossing professional boundaries. This privacy issue, combined with technical inconsistencies in the live coaching metrics when participants join late or experience audio problems, creates enough friction to motivate users to switch to tools they perceive as more reliable and respectful of privacy preferences.

FAQs

Read.ai does work for in-person meetings through its iOS app, which can capture offline meetings with one tap. However, this means Android users are left out since there's no Android app available yet.

Read.ai doesn't require a meeting bot to join virtual meetings. It records through cloud integration or browser extension for online meetings, and uses the mobile app for in-person sessions.

Users have mixed feedback on transcription quality. While summaries are generally considered smart at capturing questions and topics discussed, the live coach metrics can be inconsistent when participants join late or experience microphone issues, which suggests the underlying transcription may struggle in these scenarios.

The tool does help with action items by generating post-meeting reports that include key points and action items. However, some users find this less time-saving than expected, and the interface can be confusing with its many features, creating a steeper learning curve that may slow down the follow-up process.

Read.ai does integrate with HubSpot, Salesforce, and other business software like Confluence, Jira, Notion, and Slack. While the integrations exist, the full functionality comes at a cost - the free plan only allows 5 meetings per month, and accessing advanced integrations requires the Pro plan at $19.75 per user monthly, which is on the higher end for small teams.

Another alternative: Circleback

Read.ai users face significant security and reliability issues that undermine confidence in the platform. The most concerning problem is unauthorized meeting access, where Read.ai continues joining meetings even after users delete their accounts or revoke permissions. This creates serious privacy violations and disrupts professional calls. The platform's poor reputation is reflected in its 1.7 out of 5 Trustpilot rating across 62 reviews.

Beyond security concerns, Read.ai delivers inconsistent transcription quality with frequent speaker misidentification and errors requiring manual correction. Users report spending significant time verifying and fixing output, which eliminates the time-saving benefits they expected from an automated tool. The combination of security breaches and unreliable accuracy has driven many users to seek alternatives.

Circleback directly addresses these core problems through three main approaches: enhanced security, superior accuracy, and user control.

Security and Privacy

Where Read.ai has unauthorized access issues, Circleback provides enterprise-grade security with SOC 2 Type II certification and HIPAA compliance. All data is encrypted at rest and in transit, with explicit guarantees that customer data isn't used for AI training. Users maintain complete control over their meeting data, with customizable retention policies and strict access controls that prevent unauthorized viewing even by administrators.

Transcription Accuracy

Circleback delivers 95%+ transcription accuracy with precise speaker identification across 100+ languages, compared to Read.ai's 20+ language support. The superior accuracy means users can trust the output without spending time on verification and corrections. This reliability makes meeting notes dependable for business decisions rather than requiring manual oversight.

User Control

Instead of Read.ai's invasive bot approach that users complain about, Circleback offers botless recording through its desktop app. Users can capture meetings locally without adding external participants to calls, eliminating privacy concerns about unwanted meeting attendees. The platform also supports in-person meetings through mobile apps for both iOS and Android, unlike Read.ai's iOS-only limitation.

Additional Advantages

Circleback provides comprehensive automation capabilities that Read.ai lacks. Users can set up workflows to automatically sync action items to project management tools, update CRM records, and send follow-up emails without manual intervention. The platform integrates with major business tools including HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, and Notion.

The automation engine transforms meeting outcomes into actionable workflows, ensuring tasks and follow-ups happen automatically. This addresses another Read.ai limitation where users found the interface cluttered and the learning curve steep.

While Circleback costs slightly more at $25 per month compared to Read.ai's $19.75, users gain reliable security, accurate transcripts, and comprehensive automation that actually saves time rather than creating additional work through corrections and privacy concerns.

For organizations prioritizing data security and transcript reliability, Circleback provides the enterprise-grade solution that Read.ai fails to deliver.