Users report several significant issues with TLDV's reliability and core functionality. Many describe the platform as "terrible" and "unreliable," with some calling it "overall useless" for their business needs. The fundamental problem appears to be that TLDV fails to consistently deliver on its basic promise of meeting recording and transcription.

Technical performance issues plague the platform, particularly affecting transcript accuracy and system stability. Users frequently encounter problems with the recording functionality not working when needed most. The inconsistent performance makes it difficult for teams to rely on TLDV for important meetings, leading to frustration and lost productivity when critical information isn't captured properly.

The overall user experience suffers from these reliability problems, making TLDV unsuitable for professional environments where accurate meeting documentation is essential. Teams that initially adopted TLDV often find themselves seeking alternatives due to these persistent issues. The combination of technical problems and unreliable core features has led many users to abandon the platform entirely.

Learn more about these issues: 1 2 3

Circleback addresses these concerns by providing technically superior transcripts with exceptional accuracy and clarity that you can trust without verification. Unlike TLDV's reliability issues, Circleback offers consistent performance across all meeting formats with precise speaker identification and support for over 100 languages. The platform eliminates the need for bots and provides a simple, intuitive experience that works reliably whether meetings are online or in-person, ensuring you never miss critical information due to technical failures.

TLDV delivers solid AI meeting recording and transcription with an intuitive interface that users consistently praise. The platform offers accurate transcriptions and a generous free plan, making it accessible for budget-conscious teams. Its desktop app enables local recording for Zoom and Teams, while extensive integrations connect to over 5,000 applications including major CRMs.

However, TLDV has notable limitations in platform support and requires stable internet connectivity for optimal performance. Some users express privacy concerns about the service. The platform lacks native mobile apps, limiting flexibility for on-the-go meeting management and in-person recording capabilities.

TLDV falls short of Circleback in several key areas including in-person meeting support, mobile accessibility, and advanced automation capabilities. While TLDV offers basic AI agents, it lacks the sophisticated workflow automation and cross-meeting AI search that Circleback provides. The absence of mobile apps particularly limits TLDV's versatility compared to Circleback's comprehensive mobile solution.

The pricing structure ranges from free to $59/month for business plans, positioning TLDV as a more affordable option. Despite cost advantages, the platform's limitations in mobile support and in-person meeting capabilities may restrict its appeal for teams requiring comprehensive meeting coverage. TLDV works best for teams primarily conducting online meetings through supported platforms.

Why users switch away from TLDV

Users often switch away from TLDV due to limited platform support, which restricts their ability to use the tool across all their meeting platforms and devices. This becomes particularly problematic for teams that use diverse meeting software or need consistent functionality across different systems.

Internet connectivity issues create another major friction point for users. Since TLDV depends heavily on internet quality for its core features, users experiencing unreliable connections or working in areas with poor internet find the tool unreliable. This dependency can make meetings feel risky when users can't count on consistent recording and transcription.

Privacy concerns also drive users to seek alternatives, especially in organizations with strict data security requirements or when handling sensitive client information. Users who need to keep meeting data completely private or comply with specific regulatory requirements may find TLDV's privacy model doesn't meet their needs.

FAQs

TLDV does not work for in-person meetings, which limits its usefulness for teams that frequently meet face-to-face or in hybrid work environments.

Yes, TLDV requires a meeting bot to join your online meetings to record and transcribe them. This means other participants will see the bot in the meeting, which some may find intrusive or concerning from a privacy standpoint.

Users generally report that TLDV provides accurate transcriptions, though the quality can be affected by internet connection stability. Poor internet quality can degrade transcription accuracy, making it less reliable in areas with unstable connectivity.

TLDV does help with action item follow-up through its AI summarization and highlighting features. The tool can identify key points and action items from meetings, though users will still need to manually ensure these items are properly distributed and tracked outside of the platform.

Yes, TLDV integrates with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Linear, along with thousands of other applications. However, the effectiveness of these integrations may vary, and users are dependent on TLDV's platform support, which reviews indicate can be limited for some tools and workflows.

Another alternative: Circleback

TLDV users consistently report reliability problems that undermine the platform's core functionality. Many describe the service as "terrible" and "unreliable," with frequent failures in recording and transcription when needed most. These technical issues make it difficult for teams to depend on TLDV for important meetings, often resulting in lost information and reduced productivity.

Beyond reliability concerns, TLDV has several structural limitations that restrict its usefulness. The platform cannot record in-person meetings, limiting teams to online-only coverage. There are no mobile apps available, preventing flexible meeting capture and management. TLDV also requires meeting bots to join calls, which some participants find intrusive and raises privacy concerns in sensitive discussions.

Platform support is another weak point, with TLDV working only with select meeting software. Users frequently encounter connectivity issues since the platform depends heavily on stable internet connections for proper functionality. This dependency makes the service unreliable in areas with poor connectivity or during network problems.

Circleback addresses these fundamental issues through several technical improvements. The platform provides consistently accurate transcription without requiring verification, eliminating the reliability problems that plague TLDV users. Unlike TLDV's bot-dependent approach, Circleback offers bot-free recording through its desktop application, removing privacy concerns and meeting disruptions.

For meeting coverage, Circleback works across all platforms and environments. The mobile apps enable in-person meeting recording, while the desktop application supports local recording for online meetings. This comprehensive approach means teams can capture every meeting regardless of format or location, addressing TLDV's significant coverage gaps.

Technical performance is more robust with Circleback. The platform supports over 100 languages compared to TLDV's 30+ languages, and provides precise speaker identification even in challenging audio conditions. The system works reliably whether online or offline, eliminating the connectivity dependencies that cause TLDV failures.

Circleback also extends beyond basic recording with advanced automation capabilities. While TLDV offers only basic AI features, Circleback includes sophisticated workflow automation that can automatically create tasks, update CRM systems, and distribute meeting summaries. These automations can be shared across teams and customized for specific business needs.

The platform's search functionality allows users to query across all meeting history using natural language, making it easy to retrieve specific information or decisions from past discussions. This AI-powered search capability provides context and references to exact meeting moments, going well beyond TLDV's basic transcription approach.

For teams experiencing TLDV's reliability issues, platform limitations, or privacy concerns, Circleback provides a technically superior alternative. The combination of consistent performance, comprehensive meeting coverage, advanced automation, and robust security features addresses the core problems that drive users away from TLDV while enabling more sophisticated meeting workflows.