tldv receives mixed feedback from users, with some praising its feature-rich free plan and accurate transcription capabilities that save significant time through AI-generated summaries and relevant highlights. Users appreciate that the pro plan offers good value for money compared to other AI note-taking applications. However, some users report reliability issues, describing the service as terrible and unreliable for their business needs.

Avoma users generally report positive experiences with the AI meeting assistant, particularly appreciating how it eliminates the need to juggle note-taking during client calls and important meetings. Users describe it as a practical solution for managing meeting notes and tasks, with many finding it easy to use and effective for collaboration and project advancement. The platform is praised for allowing users to focus on productive conversations rather than manual note-taking, though it comes with a price point starting around $19-20.

For additional information about these AI meeting assistants, readers can explore reviews and detailed comparisons at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

tldv offers solid meeting recording and transcription capabilities with an intuitive interface and generous free tier. Users appreciate its accurate transcriptions and straightforward AI agents for basic automation tasks. However, the platform suffers from limited platform support and lacks mobile applications, which constrains its versatility for users who need broader accessibility.

tldv works best for individual users or small teams seeking simple meeting documentation without complex requirements. The tool's desktop-focused approach and basic automation make it suitable for straightforward recording needs. While it claims extensive integrations, the actual workflow automation remains surface-level, requiring users to manually act on meeting insights.

Avoma positions itself as a comprehensive meeting assistant with strong transcription accuracy and detailed meeting analysis features. The platform excels at organizing meeting content into actionable topics and provides robust CRM integration capabilities. However, users report that the platform can feel overly complex for simple use cases, and higher-tier pricing may deter smaller teams from accessing advanced features.

Avoma targets sales teams, customer success organizations, and enterprise users who need structured meeting workflows and detailed analytics. Its mobile app support and in-person recording capabilities make it more versatile than tldv for field teams. Despite advertising comprehensive integrations, both tools ultimately provide limited depth in actually helping users execute on meeting outcomes rather than just documenting them.

Why users switch away from tldv or Avoma

Users switch away from tldv due to limited platform support, which restricts their ability to record meetings across all the platforms they use. This limitation becomes particularly problematic for organizations that rely on multiple meeting platforms or have diverse technical requirements that tldv cannot accommodate.

The service's dependency on internet quality creates reliability issues that drive users to seek alternatives. When internet connections are unstable or slow, users experience degraded performance in recording and transcription quality, making tldv unreliable for critical business meetings where accurate documentation is essential.

Privacy concerns represent another significant factor in user churn, as organizations and individuals become increasingly cautious about how their meeting data is handled and stored. The absence of native mobile apps also limits tldv's utility for users who need to access meeting recordings and transcriptions while mobile, forcing them toward competitors like Avoma that offer dedicated iOS and Android applications for on-the-go functionality.

Users switch away from Avoma because the platform can be overly complex for simple transcription needs. The system functions as a comprehensive meeting assistant rather than a basic transcriber, making it unnecessarily hefty for individual users or teams that only need straightforward meeting notes without the full suite of features.

Technical issues drive user frustration, including bugs where the bot joins meetings late and occasional failures in speaker identification during transcriptions. While transcription accuracy rates around 95%, the detailed output can be dense and difficult to skim quickly, creating inefficiency for users who need rapid access to key information.

Cost becomes prohibitive for smaller teams, with paid plans ranging from $19 to $129 per user per month after the limited free plan. The premium pricing structure makes Avoma financially inaccessible for budget-conscious organizations, particularly when combined with the platform's complexity that may exceed their actual requirements.

FAQs

Would tldv work for in-person meetings? What about Avoma?

tldv would not work for in-person meetings. Avoma, however, does work for in-person meetings through its mobile app, which can record offline/in-person meetings for later transcription.

What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?

Users report that tldv provides accurate transcriptions. For Avoma, users rate the transcriptions very highly, with approximately 95% accuracy even when dealing with jargon or accents. However, some users note that while Avoma's transcripts are detailed, they can be dense and difficult to skim quickly.

Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?

Both tools help with follow-up actions. tldv offers AI agents for note-taking and CRM logging. Avoma generates organized notes broken into topics including next steps, automates follow-up emails, and handles CRM data entry automatically.

Do these tools integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Yes, both tools offer strong integrations. tldv integrates with HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, and over 5,000 other applications. Avoma connects with calendars and CRMs including HubSpot and Salesforce, and also integrates with Notion via Zapier.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

• Automatically-identified and assigned action items

• AI-enabled search across all meetings

• Automations with 100+ app integrations

• Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

• Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps