tldv offers strong transcription accuracy and an intuitive interface that users consistently praise. Its generous free plan makes it accessible for budget-conscious users, though it suffers from limited platform support and privacy concerns. The tool works best for teams already invested in major platforms like Zoom and Teams, but its integrations, while numerous, often lack the depth needed to truly streamline post-meeting workflows.

Bluedot distinguishes itself with exceptional transcription accuracy and a bot-free recording approach that works discretely across all major meeting platforms. However, its extremely limited free tier (only 5 meetings total) and relatively steep pricing at higher tiers can be prohibitive for smaller teams. The Chrome-dependent experience and lack of mobile support further limit its accessibility for diverse work environments.

tldv appears best suited for established teams seeking a reliable, budget-friendly solution with basic CRM integration needs. Its generous free plan makes it ideal for startups and small businesses willing to work within its platform limitations. Bluedot targets professionals who prioritize transcription accuracy above all else, particularly user researchers and sales teams who need discreet recording capabilities.

Both tools promise extensive integrations but ultimately deliver surface-level connections that require significant manual work to extract real value from meetings. While they excel at capturing and transcribing conversations, neither tool effectively bridges the gap between meeting content and actionable business outcomes. Users often find themselves still manually processing meeting insights rather than benefiting from truly automated workflow enhancement.

Comparison table

What users say about tldv and Bluedot

Users have generally positive experiences with tldv, with one reviewer reporting an absolutely positive experience after using it for over 18 months. The platform is praised for having robust features that can automate online meetings from start to finish, making it a comprehensive solution for meeting management. Based on extended real-world usage, tldv appears to deliver on its promises of streamlining meeting workflows and improving productivity.

Bluedot receives strong user approval with a 4.8 out of 5 rating from 74 reviews, where users describe it as an excellent AI-powered meeting assistant that saves time and improves productivity. The platform stands out for its integration capabilities, with reviewers noting that Bluedot offers better native integration options compared to competitors, earning it an 8/10 rating for users whose workflows depend heavily on integrations. However, some users note that while Bluedot's no-bot approach for Google Meet is appealing, it can be limited in functionality compared to more comprehensive solutions.

One primary reason users switch away from tldv is its limited platform support, which can create significant workflow constraints for businesses and individuals who need flexibility across different meeting platforms. Unlike competitors that offer broader compatibility or work seamlessly across all major video conferencing tools, tldv's restrictions can force users to adapt their meeting habits to the tool rather than having the tool adapt to their existing processes.

Another major factor driving users away is the dependency on internet quality for optimal performance. Since tldv relies heavily on cloud-based processing for its AI features like transcription and summarization, users experiencing unreliable internet connections often face poor transcription accuracy, delayed processing, or incomplete recordings. This creates frustration, especially for professionals who need consistent, reliable meeting documentation regardless of their connectivity situation.

Privacy concerns also contribute to user churn, as some individuals and organizations are uncomfortable with the level of data sharing required for tldv's cloud-based AI processing. Companies with strict data governance policies or those handling sensitive information may find tldv's privacy framework insufficient for their needs, prompting them to seek alternatives that offer more robust local processing options or stricter data protection measures.

Users often switch away from Bluedot due to its extremely restrictive free tier, which only allows 5 meetings total as essentially a trial period. This limitation forces users into paid plans much earlier than competitors, making it financially inaccessible for individuals or teams who need to test the service extensively or have occasional meeting recording needs. The steep pricing at higher tiers, with Pro plans at $25 per month and Business at $40 per month, can be difficult for small teams to justify solely for note-taking functionality.

Another significant factor driving users away is the platform's limited accessibility options, particularly its heavy reliance on Chrome desktop browsers for the best experience. Organizations that don't use Chrome or teams that require mobile support find themselves constrained by Bluedot's current technical limitations. The absence of mature mobile and desktop app support means users who need flexibility across different devices and platforms may find the service inadequate for their workflow requirements.

The paywall structure for advanced features also creates friction for users who discover that essential functionality is locked behind higher-tier plans. Features like longer video recordings, custom templates, and unlimited imports require upgrading to more expensive tiers, which can frustrate users who initially chose Bluedot for its comprehensive feature set. As a newer entrant in the market, these pricing and accessibility barriers often push users toward alternatives to Bluedot that offer better value propositions or more flexible usage models.

Using tldv

Does tldv work for in-person meetings?

No, tldv is not good for in-person meetings.

What do users say about the quality of tldv transcriptions?

Users praise tldv for having accurate transcriptions.

How does tldv help users follow up on action items?

tldv uses AI agents for recording, note-taking, and CRM logging to help with automation and follow-up tasks.

Does tldv integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Yes, tldv integrates with HubSpot, Salesforce, Notion, and over 5,000 other applications.

Using Bluedot

Does Bluedot work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Bluedot works for in-person meetings. Since it's a bot-free recorder that can capture any meeting on your device without requiring a bot to join calls, it can record meetings happening on your computer.

Does Bluedot require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

No, Bluedot does not require a meeting bot to join the meeting. It works via a Chrome extension and can quietly record and transcribe meetings without any bot presence, which means no awkward bot in meetings and it works even when you're not the meeting host.

What do users say about the quality of Bluedot transcriptions?

Users widely praise Bluedot for its transcription accuracy. Marketing materials and early users often note it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried.

How does Bluedot help users follow up on action items?

Bluedot's AI generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants through its automation engine.

Does Bluedot integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Yes, Bluedot integrates with HubSpot and Salesforce, along with other popular tools like Slack, Notion, and Google Drive. It offers one-click sync to CRM systems and project tools.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

• Automatically-identified and assigned action items

• AI-enabled search across all meetings

• Automations with 100+ app integrations

• Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

• Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps