Avoma users report that the AI meeting assistant eliminates the need to juggle note-taking during calls, allowing for more focused and productive conversations. Reviews indicate that the platform effectively captures client calls and meeting content, which users find superior to manual note-taking attempts. The service is described as a practical solution for managing meeting notes and tasks, with users noting they can't remember or write fast enough to match what the tool captures.

Bluedot users describe the platform as feeling like a true extension of their workflow, operating quietly in the background without requiring meeting invites or visible bots to join calls. The tool captures meeting content seamlessly while remaining unobtrusive during the actual conversations. Users report that it integrates naturally into their existing work processes without disrupting meeting dynamics.

Additional information about these platforms can be found at 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Avoma is a comprehensive AI meeting assistant that excels at transcription accuracy and offers strong CRM integration capabilities for sales teams. The platform provides robust features including agenda templates, live collaboration, and automated follow-up workflows. However, its complexity can be overwhelming for simple use cases, and while integrations exist, they often require workarounds like Zapier rather than native connections that truly streamline post-meeting workflows.

Bluedot distinguishes itself with exceptional transcription accuracy and a bot-free recording approach via Chrome extension. It supports over 100 languages and offers seamless recording across major meeting platforms without requiring meeting host permissions. The tool's integration capabilities appear extensive on paper, but like many competitors, they focus more on data export than creating actionable workflows that help users effectively implement meeting outcomes.

Avoma suits sales and customer success teams who need comprehensive meeting intelligence and can justify the premium pricing for advanced features. Its all-in-one approach works well for organizations already invested in CRM workflows and those requiring detailed meeting analytics. The free tier makes it accessible for small teams to test, though the full value emerges at higher subscription levels.

Bluedot appeals to individual professionals and small teams prioritizing transcription accuracy and discrete recording capabilities. It's particularly valuable for user researchers, consultants, and sales reps who frequently join meetings they don't host. However, the extremely limited free tier and Chrome dependency may restrict adoption for budget-conscious teams or organizations with diverse browser requirements.

Why users switch away from Avoma or Bluedot

Users switch away from Avoma primarily due to its complexity and heavyweight nature. The platform functions as a comprehensive meeting assistant rather than a basic transcriber, making it overkill for individual users or those with simple transcription needs. This extensive feature set can overwhelm users who only require straightforward meeting recording and note-taking capabilities.

Technical reliability issues drive user departures from Avoma. Users report that the meeting bot sometimes joins calls late, causing missed portions of conversations. Additionally, the platform occasionally struggles with speaker identification accuracy, leading to confusion about who said what during meetings. These technical glitches can disrupt workflow and reduce confidence in the platform's dependability.

The dense transcript format presents usability challenges that prompt users to seek alternatives. While Avoma generates detailed transcriptions, users find these outputs difficult to skim quickly for key information. This density forces users to spend additional time parsing through lengthy documents to extract actionable items, contradicting the time-saving purpose of using an AI meeting assistant.

Users switch away from Bluedot due to its severely restricted free tier, which offers only 5 meetings total before requiring a paid subscription. This contrasts with alternatives like Avoma that provide ongoing free plans with monthly meeting allowances, making Bluedot essentially a trial-only experience rather than a sustainable free option.

The platform's reliance on Chrome for the best experience creates limitations for users in organizations that don't use Chrome or those who need mobile support. Since Bluedot lacks mobile apps and requires Chrome for optimal functionality, users needing cross-platform flexibility or mobile recording capabilities must look elsewhere.

Bluedot's pricing structure becomes expensive at higher tiers, with Pro plans at $25/month and Business plans at $40/month. Advanced features like custom templates, unlimited video recordings, and extended meeting lengths are locked behind these premium tiers, making the platform costly for small teams who need these functionalities but cannot justify the expense for note-taking alone.

FAQs

Would Avoma work for in-person meetings? What about Bluedot?

Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Avoma has a mobile app that can record offline/in-person meetings for later transcription. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device without requiring a bot to join calls.

Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

Avoma uses a meeting bot that joins calls, though some users report the bot occasionally joins meetings late. Bluedot does not require a meeting bot - it works via a Chrome extension and can quietly record meetings in the background without any bot presence.

What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?

Both tools receive high praise for transcription accuracy. Avoma users report transcriptions are approximately 95% accurate even with jargon or accents. Bluedot is widely praised as "the most accurate" AI notetaker that users have tried, with marketing highlighting it as exceptionally accurate.

Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?

Yes, both tools assist with follow-up actions. Avoma generates organized notes broken into topics including next steps and actionable insights, automates follow-up emails, and can sync meeting information directly into CRM systems. Bluedot's AI generates follow-up emails from notes and can automatically log action items to participants.

Do these tools integrate with software like HubSpot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Yes, both tools offer integrations with major business software. Avoma connects with HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoom, Slack, and Notion (via Zapier), with strong CRM sync capabilities. Bluedot offers one-click sync to Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, Slack, Google Docs, and other systems, with a wide integration suite available.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

• Automatically-identified and assigned action items

• AI-enabled search across all meetings

• Automations with 100+ app integrations

• Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

• Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps