Avoma functions as a comprehensive AI meeting assistant that excels at transcription accuracy and offers robust CRM integration capabilities. The platform provides strong value for sales and customer success teams who need detailed meeting analytics and automated follow-up workflows. However, its feature-rich nature can feel overwhelming for users with simple transcription needs, and the higher-tier pricing may strain smaller team budgets.

Bluedot positions itself as a highly accurate, bot-free meeting recorder that operates through a Chrome extension without disrupting meeting dynamics. Its strength lies in discreet recording capabilities and wide language support, making it particularly suitable for user researchers and professionals who frequently join meetings they don't host. The platform's main limitations include an extremely restrictive free tier and dependency on Chrome for optimal performance.

Both tools target different user segments effectively - Avoma serves teams requiring comprehensive meeting management and CRM workflows, while Bluedot appeals to individual professionals and small teams prioritizing accuracy and discretion. Sales organizations and customer-facing teams may gravitate toward Avoma's structured approach, whereas consultants, researchers, and remote workers might prefer Bluedot's seamless recording experience.

Despite their respective strengths, both platforms demonstrate limitations in integration depth and actionable workflow automation. While they handle transcription and basic CRM syncing adequately, neither tool provides the sophisticated automation or comprehensive third-party connectivity needed to truly transform meeting outcomes into meaningful business actions. Users may find themselves still managing significant manual work to convert meeting insights into concrete next steps.

Comparison table

What users say about Avoma and Bluedot

Avoma reviews consistently highlight the platform as a transformative solution for organizations, with users praising its AI-powered transcription and meeting summaries that capture actionable customer insights effectively. According to HubSpot Ecosystem reviews, users particularly value how Avoma eliminates the need for manual note-taking during important client calls, as it captures information more comprehensively than hand-written notes. TrustRadius reviews emphasize the platform's ease of use, flexibility in adapting to organizational needs, and strong end-to-end security features that protect user data.

Bluedot reviews praise the platform's ability to discretely transcribe meetings even when users aren't the meeting organizers, with simple functionality that delivers transcriptions immediately after meetings conclude. Users consistently highlight in G2 pros and cons reviews how Bluedot excels at tracking meetings, notes, and action items through accurate and well-structured AI-generated summaries that save significant time. An in-depth review gives Bluedot a strong 8/10 rating, particularly noting its superior native integration options compared to competitors for users who prioritize workflow connectivity.

Users switch away from Avoma primarily due to its complexity and overwhelming feature set for simple use cases. The platform functions as a comprehensive AI meeting assistant with extensive capabilities, but this can be overkill for individual users or teams who simply need basic transcription services. The robust nature of the platform, while beneficial for large organizations with complex meeting workflows, creates unnecessary complexity for users who just want straightforward note-taking without the additional bells and whistles.

Technical issues and reliability concerns drive some users to seek alternatives. Users report experiencing minor bugs such as the meeting bot joining calls late, which can result in missing important opening discussions. Additionally, speaker identification occasionally fails, leading to confusion about who said what during meetings. While these issues may seem minor, they can significantly impact the user experience, especially for professionals who rely on accurate meeting records for important business decisions.

Cost considerations become a significant factor for smaller teams and budget-conscious organizations. Avoma's higher-tier pricing plans are positioned at premium levels, with paid plans ranging from $19 to $129 per user per month depending on the features needed. For small teams or individual users who don't require the full suite of enterprise features, this pricing structure can be prohibitive. The dense nature of the transcripts, while detailed, also makes them difficult to quickly skim through, reducing the efficiency gains that users initially sought from the platform.

Users often switch away from Bluedot due to its extremely restrictive free tier. The platform only offers 5 meetings total in its free version, which is essentially just a trial period rather than a sustainable free option. This limitation forces users to commit to a paid plan quickly, whereas competitors like Avoma offer more generous free tiers with around 10 meetings per month, making it easier for users to evaluate the service over time.

The platform's dependency on Chrome and desktop usage creates significant friction for users who need flexibility across different browsers and devices. Since Bluedot operates primarily as a Chrome extension and lacks mature mobile app support, users who work across multiple platforms or need mobile functionality often find themselves constrained. This becomes particularly problematic for teams that use different browsers or require consistent access across various devices.

Pricing concerns at higher tiers drive many users to seek alternatives, especially small teams and individual users who find the cost difficult to justify for note-taking functionality alone. The Pro and Business plans, while offering advanced features like unlimited video recording and custom templates, come at a premium price point that many users consider steep compared to the core value proposition. This pricing structure particularly impacts smaller organizations that need advanced features but cannot absorb the higher per-user costs.

Using Avoma

Does Avoma work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Avoma works for in-person meetings. It has a mobile app that can record offline/in-person meetings for later transcription.

Does Avoma require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

Avoma appears to use a meeting bot, as users have reported that "the bot sometimes joins a meeting late" in their feedback.

What do users say about the quality of Avoma transcriptions?

Users highly rate Avoma's transcription accuracy and depth, with transcriptions being approximately 95% accurate even when dealing with jargon or accents. However, some users note that while the transcripts are detailed, they can be dense and difficult to skim quickly.

How does Avoma help users follow up on action items?

Avoma helps with follow-up through its automation engine, which automates follow-up emails and generates organized notes broken into topics including next steps. It also provides actionable insights from meetings.

Does Avoma integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Yes, Avoma integrates with HubSpot and Salesforce for CRM sync, capturing meeting information directly into these platforms. It also has a strong integration ecosystem that includes Zoom, Slack, and other tools. For other integrations like Notion, it connects via Zapier.

Using Bluedot

Does Bluedot work for in-person meetings?

Yes, Bluedot works for in-person meetings. Since it's a bot-free recorder that can capture any meeting on your device, it can be used for in-person meetings without needing a bot to join calls.

Does Bluedot require a meeting bot to join the meeting?

No, Bluedot does not require a meeting bot to join the meeting. It works via a Chrome extension and can quietly record and transcribe meetings without any bot presence, which means no awkward bot in meetings and it works even when you're not the host.

What do users say about the quality of Bluedot transcriptions?

Users widely praise Bluedot for its transcription accuracy. Marketing and early users often note it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried.

How does Bluedot help users follow up on action items?

Bluedot's AI generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants through its automation engine.

Does Bluedot integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?

Yes, Bluedot integrates with HubSpot and Salesforce, along with other tools like Slack, Notion, and Google Drive. It offers one-click sync to CRM systems and project tools. However, there's no specific mention of Linear integration in the provided information.

Another alternative: Circleback

Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.

• Automatically-identified and assigned action items

• AI-enabled search across all meetings

• Automations with 100+ app integrations

• Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance

• Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps