Avoma vs. Bluedot for meeting automation
What users say
Bluedot earns praise for recording meetings without bots, delivering strong meeting notes, summaries, and task lists. EV users discuss charging discounts through the app, though some mention verification hurdles during signup.
Avoma eliminates manual note-taking during client calls, enabling more focused conversations. Users value its straightforward approach to managing meeting documentation and appreciate how it saves time for collaboration and project advancement.
Sources include Bluedot Reviews on G2, Bluedot discussions on Reddit, Avoma Customer Reviews on HubSpot, Avoma Reviews on G2, and Avoma Reviews on TrustRadius.
Why users leave these tools
Avoma departure reasons
Offers too much functionality for basic transcription needs
Contains bugs affecting meeting joins and speaker identification
Costs too much for small teams ($79-$129/user/month for higher tiers)
Bluedot departure reasons
Limits free usage to only 5 meetings lifetime
Works primarily with Chrome, lacks mobile support
Charges premium prices for essential features ($25-$40/user/month)
Head-to-head comparison
Avoma delivers comprehensive meeting assistance with strong sales and customer success focus. Records, transcribes, and integrates with CRMs effectively. Offers genuine free tier but sometimes struggles with meeting joins.
Bluedot records discreetly without bots through Chrome, generates highly accurate transcripts, and integrates across multiple platforms. Excels in transcription quality but essentially offers a trial rather than a true free plan.
Feature | Avoma | Bluedot |
---|---|---|
Free Plan | 10 meetings/month ✅ | 5 meetings total ❌ |
Transcription Accuracy | 95% accurate ✅ | Highly accurate ✅ |
In-person Recording | Mobile support ✅ | Device recording ✅ |
Local Recording | Automatic ✅ | Via app ✅ |
Integration Depth | Limited CRM ❌ | Wide but shallow ❌ |
Automation | Basic workflow ❌ | Limited actions ❌ |
Language Support | 20+ languages ✅ | 100+ languages ✅ |
Desktop App | Web-only ❌ | Available ✅ |
Mobile Apps | iOS & Android ✅ | Not available ❌ |
Bot Required | Yes ❌ | No ✅ |
Pricing Range | $0-129/month | $14-40/month |
Choose Avoma for sales teams needing CRM integration and mobile recording. Its free tier works long-term for occasional meeting documentation, making it accessible for small teams who need cross-device functionality.
Pick Bluedot for discreet recording and accurate transcription, especially if you use Chrome primarily. Works well for researchers, journalists, or professionals wanting unobtrusive recording across meeting platforms. Requires commitment to a paid plan from the start.
FAQs
Can these tools record in-person meetings? Yes, both work for in-person meetings. Avoma captures offline meetings through its mobile app. Bluedot records any meeting on your device without needing a bot.
Do they require meeting bots? Avoma uses a bot that occasionally joins meetings late according to user reviews. Bluedot functions without a bot, offering discreet background recording via Chrome extension.
How accurate are the transcriptions? Avoma achieves approximately 95% accuracy even with jargon or accents. Bluedot users consistently praise its transcription quality, often calling it "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback offers advanced AI meeting notes and automations with:
Automatically identified and assigned action items
AI-powered search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Support for both online and in-person meetings through desktop and mobile apps