June 17, 2025
Bluedot vs Granola – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Bluedot vs Granola – AI meeting recorders compared. Bluedot offers cross-platform support & 100+ integrations but limited free tier. Granola has clean interface.
Bluedot receives mixed user feedback across different platforms and applications. Users on G2 rate it 4.9 out of 5 stars with 41 reviews, praising how it integrates seamlessly into workflows by quietly joining calls without requiring invites or bots while capturing everything in the background. However, Reddit discussions reveal skepticism and confusion, with some users reporting being accused of scamming when sharing the app due to its social security requirements during signup, and others questioning whether certain Bluedot services might be fraudulent.
The granola brand landscape shows diverse options according to Bon Appétit editors who conducted taste tests of popular brands including Purely Elizabeth, Early Bird, and Sakara. Their comprehensive review covers various dietary preferences with grain-free and nut-free options available. Specific standout products mentioned include Kroma Super Granola, Michele's Granola Cinnamon Raisin, and Jamie's Farm Chai Streusel Granola.
For more information, readers can explore 1, 2, and 3.
Bluedot excels as an AI meeting recorder with high transcription accuracy and broad platform support through its Chrome extension. It offers extensive integrations with CRM systems, project management tools, and productivity apps, making it valuable for sales teams and user researchers who need precise transcripts. However, the free tier is extremely limited at just 5 meetings, and the tool requires Chrome for optimal performance while lacking mobile app support.
The integrations, while numerous, tend to be basic one-way syncs rather than deep workflow automations that truly streamline post-meeting actions. Users often find themselves manually processing the exported notes to extract actionable insights and follow-ups. The pricing becomes steep at higher tiers, particularly given the limited depth of actual productivity enhancement beyond note generation.
Granola takes a different approach as an AI notepad that enhances minimal user input with comprehensive meeting summaries. It offers a clean, Apple Notes-like interface and works discreetly across all meeting platforms by capturing system audio locally. The tool provides customizable templates and allows users to focus on conversations rather than note-taking, making it suitable for executives and professionals who prefer minimal manual input.
However, Granola's integration ecosystem is quite limited, with only basic calendar sync and Notion export currently available. The platform lacks advanced automation capabilities and remains Mac-only, restricting its accessibility for Windows users and teams. While it generates well-structured notes, users often need to manually transfer insights to other systems to complete their workflows.
Feature | Bluedot | Granola |
---|---|---|
Platform Support | Cross-platform ✅ | Mac only ❌ |
Mobile Apps | Not available ❌ | Not available ❌ |
Integration Depth | Basic sync ✅ | Very limited ❌ |
Transcription Accuracy | High accuracy ✅ | Good quality ✅ |
Free Tier | 5 meetings ❌ | 25 meetings ✅ |
Bot-free Recording | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Language Support | 100+ languages ✅ | 16 languages ✅ |
Workflow Automation | Limited ❌ | None ❌ |
Local Processing | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Price (Individual) | $18/month ❌ | $18/month ❌ |
Why users switch away from Bluedot or Granola
Users switch away from Bluedot primarily due to cost concerns. The free version is extremely limited, offering only 5 meetings total as a trial. After the trial period, users must pay for continued access, with pricing ranging from $18 per month for basic features to $40 per month for business features. The higher-tier plans (Pro/Business) have relatively steep pricing that small teams might find hard to justify purely for note-taking.
Platform compatibility represents another significant limitation driving user migration. Bluedot requires Chrome on desktop for the best experience, which creates barriers for organizations that don't use Chrome or users who need mobile support. The mobile and desktop app support are not fully mature yet, restricting access for users who work across different devices or operating systems.
Feature restrictions also contribute to user switching behavior. Some advanced features like longer video recordings and custom templates are locked behind higher-tier plans, forcing users to upgrade for full functionality. Additionally, the Basic plan limits recordings to audio-only with a 1-hour maximum per meeting, while video recording and unlimited meeting length require the more expensive Pro plan.
Users switch away from Granola primarily due to its limited platform availability. The tool currently only supports Mac desktop, with Windows support frequently requested but not yet available. Additionally, there is no mobile app for iOS or Android, restricting users to desktop-only note-taking. This creates accessibility barriers for teams using mixed operating systems or requiring mobile functionality.
Integration limitations represent another significant factor in user switching. Granola offers limited integration options, with only calendar sync and Notion export readily available, while HubSpot integration remains in beta. Users requiring extensive workflow automation or connections to CRM systems like Salesforce, project management tools, or team communication platforms find Granola's capabilities insufficient compared to alternatives.
Technical constraints around audio capture create usability issues that drive users to seek alternatives. Since Granola relies on system audio capture from the user's device, it may not function properly with certain meeting room hardware configurations or audio setups where sound is not played through the system. The tool also supports only 16 languages compared to competitors offering 100+ languages, and lacks an automation engine for advanced workflow features that users may require for comprehensive meeting management.
FAQs
Would Bluedot work for in-person meetings? What about Granola?
Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device and records locally via its app. Granola's Mac app can capture in-room audio locally, though it doesn't have a mobile app yet (Android/iOS are "coming soon").
Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
No, neither tool requires a meeting bot. Bluedot operates via a Chrome extension with no meeting bot needed, allowing for discreet background recording. Granola runs on your computer and listens to meetings without needing a bot in the call by capturing system audio.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Bluedot is widely praised for transcription accuracy, with marketing and early users often noting it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried. Users consistently highlight its accuracy as a standout feature. For Granola, users appreciate the "set and forget" note-taking approach and report that it delivers well-organized summaries, though specific transcription accuracy feedback wasn't detailed.
Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, both tools help with follow-up. Bluedot has an automation engine that generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants. Granola offers an AI assistant that can generate follow-up content, such as drafting email summaries of meetings, and structures notes with sections like "next steps."
Do these tools integrate with software like HubSpot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Bluedot has extensive integrations including HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Notion, and Google Drive, with one-click sync capabilities to CRM and project tools. Granola has more limited integrations - it includes calendar sync and Notion export, with HubSpot integration currently in beta.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.
Automatically-identified and assigned action items
AI-enabled search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps
Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting
Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.
June 17, 2025
Bluedot vs Granola – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Bluedot vs Granola – AI meeting recorders compared. Bluedot offers cross-platform support & 100+ integrations but limited free tier. Granola has clean interface.
Bluedot receives mixed user feedback across different platforms and applications. Users on G2 rate it 4.9 out of 5 stars with 41 reviews, praising how it integrates seamlessly into workflows by quietly joining calls without requiring invites or bots while capturing everything in the background. However, Reddit discussions reveal skepticism and confusion, with some users reporting being accused of scamming when sharing the app due to its social security requirements during signup, and others questioning whether certain Bluedot services might be fraudulent.
The granola brand landscape shows diverse options according to Bon Appétit editors who conducted taste tests of popular brands including Purely Elizabeth, Early Bird, and Sakara. Their comprehensive review covers various dietary preferences with grain-free and nut-free options available. Specific standout products mentioned include Kroma Super Granola, Michele's Granola Cinnamon Raisin, and Jamie's Farm Chai Streusel Granola.
For more information, readers can explore 1, 2, and 3.
Bluedot excels as an AI meeting recorder with high transcription accuracy and broad platform support through its Chrome extension. It offers extensive integrations with CRM systems, project management tools, and productivity apps, making it valuable for sales teams and user researchers who need precise transcripts. However, the free tier is extremely limited at just 5 meetings, and the tool requires Chrome for optimal performance while lacking mobile app support.
The integrations, while numerous, tend to be basic one-way syncs rather than deep workflow automations that truly streamline post-meeting actions. Users often find themselves manually processing the exported notes to extract actionable insights and follow-ups. The pricing becomes steep at higher tiers, particularly given the limited depth of actual productivity enhancement beyond note generation.
Granola takes a different approach as an AI notepad that enhances minimal user input with comprehensive meeting summaries. It offers a clean, Apple Notes-like interface and works discreetly across all meeting platforms by capturing system audio locally. The tool provides customizable templates and allows users to focus on conversations rather than note-taking, making it suitable for executives and professionals who prefer minimal manual input.
However, Granola's integration ecosystem is quite limited, with only basic calendar sync and Notion export currently available. The platform lacks advanced automation capabilities and remains Mac-only, restricting its accessibility for Windows users and teams. While it generates well-structured notes, users often need to manually transfer insights to other systems to complete their workflows.
Feature | Bluedot | Granola |
---|---|---|
Platform Support | Cross-platform ✅ | Mac only ❌ |
Mobile Apps | Not available ❌ | Not available ❌ |
Integration Depth | Basic sync ✅ | Very limited ❌ |
Transcription Accuracy | High accuracy ✅ | Good quality ✅ |
Free Tier | 5 meetings ❌ | 25 meetings ✅ |
Bot-free Recording | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Language Support | 100+ languages ✅ | 16 languages ✅ |
Workflow Automation | Limited ❌ | None ❌ |
Local Processing | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Price (Individual) | $18/month ❌ | $18/month ❌ |
Why users switch away from Bluedot or Granola
Users switch away from Bluedot primarily due to cost concerns. The free version is extremely limited, offering only 5 meetings total as a trial. After the trial period, users must pay for continued access, with pricing ranging from $18 per month for basic features to $40 per month for business features. The higher-tier plans (Pro/Business) have relatively steep pricing that small teams might find hard to justify purely for note-taking.
Platform compatibility represents another significant limitation driving user migration. Bluedot requires Chrome on desktop for the best experience, which creates barriers for organizations that don't use Chrome or users who need mobile support. The mobile and desktop app support are not fully mature yet, restricting access for users who work across different devices or operating systems.
Feature restrictions also contribute to user switching behavior. Some advanced features like longer video recordings and custom templates are locked behind higher-tier plans, forcing users to upgrade for full functionality. Additionally, the Basic plan limits recordings to audio-only with a 1-hour maximum per meeting, while video recording and unlimited meeting length require the more expensive Pro plan.
Users switch away from Granola primarily due to its limited platform availability. The tool currently only supports Mac desktop, with Windows support frequently requested but not yet available. Additionally, there is no mobile app for iOS or Android, restricting users to desktop-only note-taking. This creates accessibility barriers for teams using mixed operating systems or requiring mobile functionality.
Integration limitations represent another significant factor in user switching. Granola offers limited integration options, with only calendar sync and Notion export readily available, while HubSpot integration remains in beta. Users requiring extensive workflow automation or connections to CRM systems like Salesforce, project management tools, or team communication platforms find Granola's capabilities insufficient compared to alternatives.
Technical constraints around audio capture create usability issues that drive users to seek alternatives. Since Granola relies on system audio capture from the user's device, it may not function properly with certain meeting room hardware configurations or audio setups where sound is not played through the system. The tool also supports only 16 languages compared to competitors offering 100+ languages, and lacks an automation engine for advanced workflow features that users may require for comprehensive meeting management.
FAQs
Would Bluedot work for in-person meetings? What about Granola?
Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device and records locally via its app. Granola's Mac app can capture in-room audio locally, though it doesn't have a mobile app yet (Android/iOS are "coming soon").
Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
No, neither tool requires a meeting bot. Bluedot operates via a Chrome extension with no meeting bot needed, allowing for discreet background recording. Granola runs on your computer and listens to meetings without needing a bot in the call by capturing system audio.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Bluedot is widely praised for transcription accuracy, with marketing and early users often noting it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried. Users consistently highlight its accuracy as a standout feature. For Granola, users appreciate the "set and forget" note-taking approach and report that it delivers well-organized summaries, though specific transcription accuracy feedback wasn't detailed.
Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, both tools help with follow-up. Bluedot has an automation engine that generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants. Granola offers an AI assistant that can generate follow-up content, such as drafting email summaries of meetings, and structures notes with sections like "next steps."
Do these tools integrate with software like HubSpot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Bluedot has extensive integrations including HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Notion, and Google Drive, with one-click sync capabilities to CRM and project tools. Granola has more limited integrations - it includes calendar sync and Notion export, with HubSpot integration currently in beta.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.
Automatically-identified and assigned action items
AI-enabled search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.
June 17, 2025
Bluedot vs Granola – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Bluedot vs Granola – AI meeting recorders compared. Bluedot offers cross-platform support & 100+ integrations but limited free tier. Granola has clean interface.
Bluedot receives mixed user feedback across different platforms and applications. Users on G2 rate it 4.9 out of 5 stars with 41 reviews, praising how it integrates seamlessly into workflows by quietly joining calls without requiring invites or bots while capturing everything in the background. However, Reddit discussions reveal skepticism and confusion, with some users reporting being accused of scamming when sharing the app due to its social security requirements during signup, and others questioning whether certain Bluedot services might be fraudulent.
The granola brand landscape shows diverse options according to Bon Appétit editors who conducted taste tests of popular brands including Purely Elizabeth, Early Bird, and Sakara. Their comprehensive review covers various dietary preferences with grain-free and nut-free options available. Specific standout products mentioned include Kroma Super Granola, Michele's Granola Cinnamon Raisin, and Jamie's Farm Chai Streusel Granola.
For more information, readers can explore 1, 2, and 3.
Bluedot excels as an AI meeting recorder with high transcription accuracy and broad platform support through its Chrome extension. It offers extensive integrations with CRM systems, project management tools, and productivity apps, making it valuable for sales teams and user researchers who need precise transcripts. However, the free tier is extremely limited at just 5 meetings, and the tool requires Chrome for optimal performance while lacking mobile app support.
The integrations, while numerous, tend to be basic one-way syncs rather than deep workflow automations that truly streamline post-meeting actions. Users often find themselves manually processing the exported notes to extract actionable insights and follow-ups. The pricing becomes steep at higher tiers, particularly given the limited depth of actual productivity enhancement beyond note generation.
Granola takes a different approach as an AI notepad that enhances minimal user input with comprehensive meeting summaries. It offers a clean, Apple Notes-like interface and works discreetly across all meeting platforms by capturing system audio locally. The tool provides customizable templates and allows users to focus on conversations rather than note-taking, making it suitable for executives and professionals who prefer minimal manual input.
However, Granola's integration ecosystem is quite limited, with only basic calendar sync and Notion export currently available. The platform lacks advanced automation capabilities and remains Mac-only, restricting its accessibility for Windows users and teams. While it generates well-structured notes, users often need to manually transfer insights to other systems to complete their workflows.
Feature | Bluedot | Granola |
---|---|---|
Platform Support | Cross-platform ✅ | Mac only ❌ |
Mobile Apps | Not available ❌ | Not available ❌ |
Integration Depth | Basic sync ✅ | Very limited ❌ |
Transcription Accuracy | High accuracy ✅ | Good quality ✅ |
Free Tier | 5 meetings ❌ | 25 meetings ✅ |
Bot-free Recording | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Language Support | 100+ languages ✅ | 16 languages ✅ |
Workflow Automation | Limited ❌ | None ❌ |
Local Processing | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Price (Individual) | $18/month ❌ | $18/month ❌ |
Why users switch away from Bluedot or Granola
Users switch away from Bluedot primarily due to cost concerns. The free version is extremely limited, offering only 5 meetings total as a trial. After the trial period, users must pay for continued access, with pricing ranging from $18 per month for basic features to $40 per month for business features. The higher-tier plans (Pro/Business) have relatively steep pricing that small teams might find hard to justify purely for note-taking.
Platform compatibility represents another significant limitation driving user migration. Bluedot requires Chrome on desktop for the best experience, which creates barriers for organizations that don't use Chrome or users who need mobile support. The mobile and desktop app support are not fully mature yet, restricting access for users who work across different devices or operating systems.
Feature restrictions also contribute to user switching behavior. Some advanced features like longer video recordings and custom templates are locked behind higher-tier plans, forcing users to upgrade for full functionality. Additionally, the Basic plan limits recordings to audio-only with a 1-hour maximum per meeting, while video recording and unlimited meeting length require the more expensive Pro plan.
Users switch away from Granola primarily due to its limited platform availability. The tool currently only supports Mac desktop, with Windows support frequently requested but not yet available. Additionally, there is no mobile app for iOS or Android, restricting users to desktop-only note-taking. This creates accessibility barriers for teams using mixed operating systems or requiring mobile functionality.
Integration limitations represent another significant factor in user switching. Granola offers limited integration options, with only calendar sync and Notion export readily available, while HubSpot integration remains in beta. Users requiring extensive workflow automation or connections to CRM systems like Salesforce, project management tools, or team communication platforms find Granola's capabilities insufficient compared to alternatives.
Technical constraints around audio capture create usability issues that drive users to seek alternatives. Since Granola relies on system audio capture from the user's device, it may not function properly with certain meeting room hardware configurations or audio setups where sound is not played through the system. The tool also supports only 16 languages compared to competitors offering 100+ languages, and lacks an automation engine for advanced workflow features that users may require for comprehensive meeting management.
FAQs
Would Bluedot work for in-person meetings? What about Granola?
Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device and records locally via its app. Granola's Mac app can capture in-room audio locally, though it doesn't have a mobile app yet (Android/iOS are "coming soon").
Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
No, neither tool requires a meeting bot. Bluedot operates via a Chrome extension with no meeting bot needed, allowing for discreet background recording. Granola runs on your computer and listens to meetings without needing a bot in the call by capturing system audio.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Bluedot is widely praised for transcription accuracy, with marketing and early users often noting it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried. Users consistently highlight its accuracy as a standout feature. For Granola, users appreciate the "set and forget" note-taking approach and report that it delivers well-organized summaries, though specific transcription accuracy feedback wasn't detailed.
Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, both tools help with follow-up. Bluedot has an automation engine that generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants. Granola offers an AI assistant that can generate follow-up content, such as drafting email summaries of meetings, and structures notes with sections like "next steps."
Do these tools integrate with software like HubSpot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Bluedot has extensive integrations including HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Notion, and Google Drive, with one-click sync capabilities to CRM and project tools. Granola has more limited integrations - it includes calendar sync and Notion export, with HubSpot integration currently in beta.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.
Automatically-identified and assigned action items
AI-enabled search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps
Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting
Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.