June 17, 2025
Bluedot vs Krisp – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Compare Bluedot vs Krisp – AI meeting tools for transcription, noise cancellation, and productivity. See features, pricing, user reviews, and alternatives.
Bluedot users report that the application integrates seamlessly into their workflow by joining calls without requiring invites or bots and capturing content in the background. Reviews indicate the AI functionality saves time and helps users avoid forgetting important information while organizing and tracking tasks. Users appreciate features like the upload capability and find the tool operates as expected for AI-powered assistance.
Krisp receives positive feedback for its noise cancellation capabilities, with users noting it can effectively filter out sounds like clapping near the microphone. The application has maintained a user base through its free version over several years. Users in digital nomad and remote work communities discuss it as a viable option for noise cancellation software.
Readers can learn more at 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Bluedot excels at transcription accuracy and operates without requiring meeting bots, making it ideal for discreet recording across major platforms. It offers solid integrations with CRMs and productivity tools, plus supports over 100 languages. However, the free tier is essentially a trial with only 5 lifetime meetings, and pricing becomes steep at higher tiers, particularly for smaller teams.
The tool works best for sales teams, user researchers, and professionals who prioritize transcription quality and need seamless workflow integration. Its Chrome extension approach means it can work even when you're not the meeting host. While the integrations exist, they remain somewhat basic and don't fully capitalize on turning meeting insights into actionable workflows.
Krisp combines noise cancellation with meeting transcription, making it unique for users in noisy environments who need both cleaner audio and automated notes. Its noise removal technology is highly praised and works reliably across communication platforms. The pricing is more accessible than Bluedot, with a functional free tier offering 60 minutes daily of noise cancellation and basic meeting summaries.
This tool suits remote workers, call center staff, and anyone dealing with audio quality issues during meetings. The dual functionality of audio enhancement plus note-taking provides solid value for its price point. However, like Bluedot, the integrations are limited in scope and don't offer the depth needed for comprehensive meeting follow-up and task management.
Feature | Bluedot | Krisp |
---|---|---|
Transcription Accuracy | Excellent ✅ | Good ✅ |
Free Tier | Very Limited ❌ | Reasonable ✅ |
Noise Cancellation | None ❌ | Excellent ✅ |
Bot-Free Recording | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Mobile Support | None ❌ | None ❌ |
Language Support | 100+ Languages ✅ | 90+ Languages ✅ |
Integration Depth | Basic ❌ | Limited ❌ |
Automation Engine | Basic ❌ | Partial ❌ |
Starting Price | $14/month ❌ | $8/month ✅ |
Desktop App | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Why users switch away from Bluedot or Krisp
Users switch away from Bluedot primarily due to cost considerations. The free version offers only 5 meetings lifetime, functioning essentially as a trial rather than a usable free tier. The pricing structure escalates quickly, with the Basic plan at $18 per user monthly, Pro at $25 monthly, and Business at $40 monthly. For small teams or individuals who need basic meeting recording functionality, these higher-tier costs become difficult to justify compared to competitors offering more generous free plans.
Platform and device limitations drive users to seek alternatives. Bluedot requires Chrome for the best experience, creating restrictions for organizations using different browsers. The tool lacks mobile app support, with mobile and desktop app functionality remaining underdeveloped. This constraint affects users who need flexibility across different devices or platforms beyond the Chrome extension environment.
Feature accessibility becomes problematic as advanced capabilities remain locked behind higher payment tiers. Custom templates, longer video recordings, and other enhanced features require upgrading to Pro or Business plans. The Basic plan restricts users to 1-hour maximum meetings and audio-only recordings, while unlimited video recording and meeting length only become available at the $25 monthly Pro level.
Users switch away from Krisp primarily due to audio quality issues that can impact their core functionality. Some users report that Krisp occasionally distorts the speaker's voice or clips words, especially when trying to cancel very loud noises, which can affect transcription accuracy. This undermines both the noise cancellation and meeting transcription features that users rely on.
The limited free tier creates usage constraints that drive users to seek alternatives. Krisp restricts free users to only 60 minutes per day of noise cancellation and up to 2 meeting summaries per day, which proves insufficient for heavy users who need consistent access throughout their workday.
Resource consumption and cost concerns also contribute to user churn. Several users cite high CPU usage when Krisp is active, which can slow down their systems during important calls. Additionally, some users find the Pro version pricing too high if they only need one of the features rather than the full noise cancellation and meeting notes combination.
FAQs
Would Bluedot work for in-person meetings? What about Krisp?
Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device, and Krisp can capture any conversation (online or offline) using noise-canceling audio on your device.
Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
No, neither tool requires a meeting bot. Bluedot is provided via a Chrome extension with no meeting bot needed, allowing for discreet background recording. Krisp records and transcribes meetings locally via its app without requiring a bot.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Bluedot is widely praised for transcription accuracy, with users often noting it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried. For Krisp, users have reported that the AI summaries with key points and action items are "extremely accurate" and require minimal edits, though some users mention that audio quirks (like voice distortion or word clipping) can occasionally affect transcription accuracy.
Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, both tools help with follow-up. Bluedot's AI generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants. Krisp automatically generates meeting notes and summaries, and allows task delegation within the app.
Do these tools integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Yes, both offer integrations. Bluedot has a wide integration suite including Slack, Notion, Google Drive, HubSpot, and Salesforce, with one-click sync to CRM systems. Krisp provides calendar integration for one-click recording and native HubSpot CRM integration to push summaries.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.
Automatically-identified and assigned action items
AI-enabled search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps
Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting
Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.
June 17, 2025
Bluedot vs Krisp – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Compare Bluedot vs Krisp – AI meeting tools for transcription, noise cancellation, and productivity. See features, pricing, user reviews, and alternatives.
Bluedot users report that the application integrates seamlessly into their workflow by joining calls without requiring invites or bots and capturing content in the background. Reviews indicate the AI functionality saves time and helps users avoid forgetting important information while organizing and tracking tasks. Users appreciate features like the upload capability and find the tool operates as expected for AI-powered assistance.
Krisp receives positive feedback for its noise cancellation capabilities, with users noting it can effectively filter out sounds like clapping near the microphone. The application has maintained a user base through its free version over several years. Users in digital nomad and remote work communities discuss it as a viable option for noise cancellation software.
Readers can learn more at 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Bluedot excels at transcription accuracy and operates without requiring meeting bots, making it ideal for discreet recording across major platforms. It offers solid integrations with CRMs and productivity tools, plus supports over 100 languages. However, the free tier is essentially a trial with only 5 lifetime meetings, and pricing becomes steep at higher tiers, particularly for smaller teams.
The tool works best for sales teams, user researchers, and professionals who prioritize transcription quality and need seamless workflow integration. Its Chrome extension approach means it can work even when you're not the meeting host. While the integrations exist, they remain somewhat basic and don't fully capitalize on turning meeting insights into actionable workflows.
Krisp combines noise cancellation with meeting transcription, making it unique for users in noisy environments who need both cleaner audio and automated notes. Its noise removal technology is highly praised and works reliably across communication platforms. The pricing is more accessible than Bluedot, with a functional free tier offering 60 minutes daily of noise cancellation and basic meeting summaries.
This tool suits remote workers, call center staff, and anyone dealing with audio quality issues during meetings. The dual functionality of audio enhancement plus note-taking provides solid value for its price point. However, like Bluedot, the integrations are limited in scope and don't offer the depth needed for comprehensive meeting follow-up and task management.
Feature | Bluedot | Krisp |
---|---|---|
Transcription Accuracy | Excellent ✅ | Good ✅ |
Free Tier | Very Limited ❌ | Reasonable ✅ |
Noise Cancellation | None ❌ | Excellent ✅ |
Bot-Free Recording | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Mobile Support | None ❌ | None ❌ |
Language Support | 100+ Languages ✅ | 90+ Languages ✅ |
Integration Depth | Basic ❌ | Limited ❌ |
Automation Engine | Basic ❌ | Partial ❌ |
Starting Price | $14/month ❌ | $8/month ✅ |
Desktop App | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Why users switch away from Bluedot or Krisp
Users switch away from Bluedot primarily due to cost considerations. The free version offers only 5 meetings lifetime, functioning essentially as a trial rather than a usable free tier. The pricing structure escalates quickly, with the Basic plan at $18 per user monthly, Pro at $25 monthly, and Business at $40 monthly. For small teams or individuals who need basic meeting recording functionality, these higher-tier costs become difficult to justify compared to competitors offering more generous free plans.
Platform and device limitations drive users to seek alternatives. Bluedot requires Chrome for the best experience, creating restrictions for organizations using different browsers. The tool lacks mobile app support, with mobile and desktop app functionality remaining underdeveloped. This constraint affects users who need flexibility across different devices or platforms beyond the Chrome extension environment.
Feature accessibility becomes problematic as advanced capabilities remain locked behind higher payment tiers. Custom templates, longer video recordings, and other enhanced features require upgrading to Pro or Business plans. The Basic plan restricts users to 1-hour maximum meetings and audio-only recordings, while unlimited video recording and meeting length only become available at the $25 monthly Pro level.
Users switch away from Krisp primarily due to audio quality issues that can impact their core functionality. Some users report that Krisp occasionally distorts the speaker's voice or clips words, especially when trying to cancel very loud noises, which can affect transcription accuracy. This undermines both the noise cancellation and meeting transcription features that users rely on.
The limited free tier creates usage constraints that drive users to seek alternatives. Krisp restricts free users to only 60 minutes per day of noise cancellation and up to 2 meeting summaries per day, which proves insufficient for heavy users who need consistent access throughout their workday.
Resource consumption and cost concerns also contribute to user churn. Several users cite high CPU usage when Krisp is active, which can slow down their systems during important calls. Additionally, some users find the Pro version pricing too high if they only need one of the features rather than the full noise cancellation and meeting notes combination.
FAQs
Would Bluedot work for in-person meetings? What about Krisp?
Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device, and Krisp can capture any conversation (online or offline) using noise-canceling audio on your device.
Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
No, neither tool requires a meeting bot. Bluedot is provided via a Chrome extension with no meeting bot needed, allowing for discreet background recording. Krisp records and transcribes meetings locally via its app without requiring a bot.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Bluedot is widely praised for transcription accuracy, with users often noting it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried. For Krisp, users have reported that the AI summaries with key points and action items are "extremely accurate" and require minimal edits, though some users mention that audio quirks (like voice distortion or word clipping) can occasionally affect transcription accuracy.
Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, both tools help with follow-up. Bluedot's AI generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants. Krisp automatically generates meeting notes and summaries, and allows task delegation within the app.
Do these tools integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Yes, both offer integrations. Bluedot has a wide integration suite including Slack, Notion, Google Drive, HubSpot, and Salesforce, with one-click sync to CRM systems. Krisp provides calendar integration for one-click recording and native HubSpot CRM integration to push summaries.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.
Automatically-identified and assigned action items
AI-enabled search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.
June 17, 2025
Bluedot vs Krisp – Which meeting automation tool is right for you?
Compare Bluedot vs Krisp – AI meeting tools for transcription, noise cancellation, and productivity. See features, pricing, user reviews, and alternatives.
Bluedot users report that the application integrates seamlessly into their workflow by joining calls without requiring invites or bots and capturing content in the background. Reviews indicate the AI functionality saves time and helps users avoid forgetting important information while organizing and tracking tasks. Users appreciate features like the upload capability and find the tool operates as expected for AI-powered assistance.
Krisp receives positive feedback for its noise cancellation capabilities, with users noting it can effectively filter out sounds like clapping near the microphone. The application has maintained a user base through its free version over several years. Users in digital nomad and remote work communities discuss it as a viable option for noise cancellation software.
Readers can learn more at 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Bluedot excels at transcription accuracy and operates without requiring meeting bots, making it ideal for discreet recording across major platforms. It offers solid integrations with CRMs and productivity tools, plus supports over 100 languages. However, the free tier is essentially a trial with only 5 lifetime meetings, and pricing becomes steep at higher tiers, particularly for smaller teams.
The tool works best for sales teams, user researchers, and professionals who prioritize transcription quality and need seamless workflow integration. Its Chrome extension approach means it can work even when you're not the meeting host. While the integrations exist, they remain somewhat basic and don't fully capitalize on turning meeting insights into actionable workflows.
Krisp combines noise cancellation with meeting transcription, making it unique for users in noisy environments who need both cleaner audio and automated notes. Its noise removal technology is highly praised and works reliably across communication platforms. The pricing is more accessible than Bluedot, with a functional free tier offering 60 minutes daily of noise cancellation and basic meeting summaries.
This tool suits remote workers, call center staff, and anyone dealing with audio quality issues during meetings. The dual functionality of audio enhancement plus note-taking provides solid value for its price point. However, like Bluedot, the integrations are limited in scope and don't offer the depth needed for comprehensive meeting follow-up and task management.
Feature | Bluedot | Krisp |
---|---|---|
Transcription Accuracy | Excellent ✅ | Good ✅ |
Free Tier | Very Limited ❌ | Reasonable ✅ |
Noise Cancellation | None ❌ | Excellent ✅ |
Bot-Free Recording | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Mobile Support | None ❌ | None ❌ |
Language Support | 100+ Languages ✅ | 90+ Languages ✅ |
Integration Depth | Basic ❌ | Limited ❌ |
Automation Engine | Basic ❌ | Partial ❌ |
Starting Price | $14/month ❌ | $8/month ✅ |
Desktop App | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
Why users switch away from Bluedot or Krisp
Users switch away from Bluedot primarily due to cost considerations. The free version offers only 5 meetings lifetime, functioning essentially as a trial rather than a usable free tier. The pricing structure escalates quickly, with the Basic plan at $18 per user monthly, Pro at $25 monthly, and Business at $40 monthly. For small teams or individuals who need basic meeting recording functionality, these higher-tier costs become difficult to justify compared to competitors offering more generous free plans.
Platform and device limitations drive users to seek alternatives. Bluedot requires Chrome for the best experience, creating restrictions for organizations using different browsers. The tool lacks mobile app support, with mobile and desktop app functionality remaining underdeveloped. This constraint affects users who need flexibility across different devices or platforms beyond the Chrome extension environment.
Feature accessibility becomes problematic as advanced capabilities remain locked behind higher payment tiers. Custom templates, longer video recordings, and other enhanced features require upgrading to Pro or Business plans. The Basic plan restricts users to 1-hour maximum meetings and audio-only recordings, while unlimited video recording and meeting length only become available at the $25 monthly Pro level.
Users switch away from Krisp primarily due to audio quality issues that can impact their core functionality. Some users report that Krisp occasionally distorts the speaker's voice or clips words, especially when trying to cancel very loud noises, which can affect transcription accuracy. This undermines both the noise cancellation and meeting transcription features that users rely on.
The limited free tier creates usage constraints that drive users to seek alternatives. Krisp restricts free users to only 60 minutes per day of noise cancellation and up to 2 meeting summaries per day, which proves insufficient for heavy users who need consistent access throughout their workday.
Resource consumption and cost concerns also contribute to user churn. Several users cite high CPU usage when Krisp is active, which can slow down their systems during important calls. Additionally, some users find the Pro version pricing too high if they only need one of the features rather than the full noise cancellation and meeting notes combination.
FAQs
Would Bluedot work for in-person meetings? What about Krisp?
Yes, both tools work for in-person meetings. Bluedot's bot-free recorder can capture any meeting on your device, and Krisp can capture any conversation (online or offline) using noise-canceling audio on your device.
Does either of these tools require a meeting bot to join the meeting?
No, neither tool requires a meeting bot. Bluedot is provided via a Chrome extension with no meeting bot needed, allowing for discreet background recording. Krisp records and transcribes meetings locally via its app without requiring a bot.
What do users say about the quality of transcriptions?
Bluedot is widely praised for transcription accuracy, with users often noting it as "the most accurate" AI notetaker they've tried. For Krisp, users have reported that the AI summaries with key points and action items are "extremely accurate" and require minimal edits, though some users mention that audio quirks (like voice distortion or word clipping) can occasionally affect transcription accuracy.
Do these tools help a user follow up with action items from the meeting? How so?
Yes, both tools help with follow-up. Bluedot's AI generates follow-up emails from notes and can log action items to participants. Krisp automatically generates meeting notes and summaries, and allows task delegation within the app.
Do these tools integrate with software like Hubspot, Salesforce, or Linear?
Yes, both offer integrations. Bluedot has a wide integration suite including Slack, Notion, Google Drive, HubSpot, and Salesforce, with one-click sync to CRM systems. Krisp provides calendar integration for one-click recording and native HubSpot CRM integration to push summaries.
Another alternative: Circleback
Circleback provides best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes and automations. We support over 100 languages and automatic participant identification in both in-person and online meetings.
Automatically-identified and assigned action items
AI-enabled search across all meetings
Automations with 100+ app integrations
Industry-leading security with SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, and HIPAA compliance
Ability to capture both online and in-person meetings with desktop and mobile apps
Table of Contents
Get the most out of every meeting
Best-in-class AI-powered meeting notes, action items, and automations.
Try it free for 7 days. Subscribe if you love it.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2025 Circleback AI, Inc. All rights reserved.